Re: Access to the IPv4 net for IPv6-only systems, was: Re: WG Action: Conclusion of IP Version 6 (ipv6)

From: Mark Newton (no email)
Date: Wed Oct 03 2007 - 09:52:59 EDT

  • Next message: (no email): "RE: Creating demand for IPv6"

    On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:02:31PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

    > The tricky part is that we're not going to agree on that as a
    > community, so the status quo will persist until someone cares enough
    > to do something drastic that moves the entire industry in one
    > direction or another.

    That isn't actually true. I could move to IPv6 and deploy a NAT-PT
    box to give my customers access to the v4 Internet regardless of
    whatever the rest of the community thinks.

    This whole "debate" is a complete waste of time, because everyone,
    yourself included, knows that regardless of what consensus we end
    up with, at the end of the day if NAT makes sense NAT will be
    deployed. End of story, game over.

    This whole meme that says we need the entire industry to move in
    the same direction at the same time is yet another delaying
    fallacy, and yet another example of you proposing that we all
    behave like old-skool telcos inside the exact same 24 hour period
    when you decry any suggestion that we act like old-skool telcos.

    Whatever.

      - mark

    -- 
    Mark Newton                               Email:   (W)
    Network Engineer                          Email:    (H)
    Internode Systems Pty Ltd                 Desk:   +61-8-82282999
    "Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton"  Mobile: +61-416-202-223
    

  • Next message: (no email): "RE: Creating demand for IPv6"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD