Re: Level(3) faux paux

From: Charles Yamasaki (no email)
Date: Thu Jul 12 2007 - 02:22:16 EDT

  • Next message: (no name): "Re: Level(3) faux paux"

    Cuz they are taking over at a rate that their best engineers canšt meet.

    On 7/11/07 11:08 PM, "Chris L. Morrow"
    <> wrote:

    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Security Admin (NetSec) wrote:
    >
    >> > I have noticed that Level(3) misconfigs/outages seem to happen more
    >> > frequently than with most other Tier 1's. Am unsure whether or not this
    >
    > maybe they have a larger change-rate? or more folks that notice problems
    > and complain here? (note that I don't know but suspect everyone has a
    > relatively close approximation of this figure at a certain place in the
    > network-size-tiering)
    >
    >> > show up more often with issues than say Sprint [AS1239]. Is their any
    >
    > (cause they don't let Ted on routers anymore...)
    >
    >> > one (or any coporation) that keeps track of outages such as these?
    >> > Would think it might be a good thing to know for proper mulit-homing
    >> > relationships to minimize the type of outage that Yahoo faced...
    >
    > Because someone 3 as-hops away sucking down your prefix and traffic is
    > your direct provider's problem how?
    >
    > -Chris
    >


  • Next message: (no name): "Re: Level(3) faux paux"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD