RE: Level(3) faux paux

From: Neil J. McRae (no email)
Date: Thu Jul 12 2007 - 02:14:48 EDT

  • Next message: Charles Yamasaki: "Re: Level(3) faux paux"

    Maybe level 3 have more vocal or higher profile customer base? Personally speaking I've found level 3 to have outstanding service and network availibility.

    Neil. -----Original Message----- From: Security Admin (NetSec) <>
    Sent: 12 July 2007 06:56
    To: <>
    Subject: Level(3) faux paux

    I have noticed that Level(3) misconfigs/outages seem to happen more frequently than with most other Tier 1’s.  Am unsure whether or not this is a mis-statement, but based on NANOG posts, Level(3) [AS3356] seems to show up more often with issues than say Sprint [AS1239].  Is their any one (or any coporation) that keeps track of outages such as these?  Would think it might be a good thing to know for proper mulit-homing relationships to minimize the type of outage that Yahoo faced…
     
    SecAdmin (aka Edward Ray)


  • Next message: Charles Yamasaki: "Re: Level(3) faux paux"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD