RE: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6

(no email)
Date: Sun Jul 01 2007 - 17:41:55 EDT

  • Next message: Security Admin (NetSec): "RE: issues Level3 versus rest of the world?"

    > - that less than 50% of the v4 space is currently routed.
    > scarcity will presumably cause these non-routed blocks to be:
    > :- used and routes
    > :- reclaimed and reassigned
    > :- sold on

    Uh, no. Just because the address space is not visible in the public
    Internet's default free zone does not mean that it is sitting on a shelf
    in a dusty warehouse. Most of that space is actively in use by
    organizations who explicitly want an IP internetwork that is
    disconnected from the Internet, or by organizations who can achieve
    multihomed connectivity from two upstreams without needing their routes
    to be propogated between those upstreams. This kind of thing happens way
    out at the edges of the network, far from the core, where two upstreams
    maintain peering links (possible at a local Internet exchanges).

    So to sum up. They are used and routed already. They cannot be reclaimed
    since they are fully justified. And they can't be sold because they are
    used for mission critical networks.

    > - that much of the space in use within organisations could be
    > optimised
    > :- mop up unused gaps in subnet

    This will cause routing table scaling problems inside organizations,
    exacerbated by the greater amount of legacy hardware found in such
    environments.

    --Michael Dillon


  • Next message: Security Admin (NetSec): "RE: issues Level3 versus rest of the world?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD