Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?

From: Barrett Lyon (no email)
Date: Fri Jun 29 2007 - 12:40:14 EDT

  • Next message: JAKO Andras: "Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?"

    > One note here is that even though you can get glue into com/net/org
    > using this method, there is no IPv6 glue for the root yet, as such
    > even
    > if you manage to get the IPv6 glue in, it won't accomplish much
    > (except
    > sending all IPv6 capable resolvers over IPv6 transport :) as all

    Unless I did this query wrong, you are absolutely right:

    ;. IN NS
    A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 198.41.0.4
    B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.228.79.201
    C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.33.4.12
    D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 128.8.10.90
    E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.203.230.10
    F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.5.5.241
    G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.112.36.4
    H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 128.63.2.53
    I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.36.148.17
    J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 192.58.128.30
    K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 193.0.14.129
    L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 198.32.64.12
    M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 IN A 202.12.27.33

    I don't see any v6 glue there... Rather than having conversations
    about transition to IPv6, maybe we should be sure it works natively
    first? It's rather ironic to think that for v6 DNS to work an
    incumbent legacy protocol is still required. The GTLD's appear to
    have somewhat better v6 services than root:

    A.GTLD-SERVERS.NET. 172800 IN AAAA 2001:503:a83e::2:30
    B.GTLD-SERVERS.NET. 172800 IN AAAA 2001:503:231d::2:30

    I'm pretty disappointed now,

    -Barrett


  • Next message: JAKO Andras: "Re: ICANN registrar supporting v6 glue?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD