From: Donald Stahl (no email)
Date: Mon Jun 04 2007 - 20:56:40 EDT
> Surely that second quote should be "crap, now macrumors can tell that one
> person in our office follows them obsessively"? Unless there's
> publically-available information that indicates that IP address is your
> CEO's (which is a whole other topic -- publically available rDNS for
> company-internal IPv6 ranges).
In addition, IPv6 supports temporary addresses that can change every day.
If your browser binds to a temporary address, and it changes daily, then
the anonymizing feature of NAT becomes a whole lot less useful.
>> NAT is still evil though, the problems it causes operationally are
>> just plain not worth it.
> Amen to that.
I think evil sums up NAT nicely :)
-Don
|
|
|