Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted

From: Paul Vixie (no email)
Date: Sat Jun 02 2007 - 13:54:04 EDT

  • Next message: Paul Vixie: "Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)"

    > > how much of the v4 prefix count is de-aggregation for te or by TWits?
    > > why won't they do this in v6?
    >
    > you mean like:
    >
    > AS4755
    > AS4134
    > AS18566
    > AS4323
    > AS9498
    > AS6478
    > AS11492
    > AS22773
    > AS8151
    > AS19262
    > AS6197
    >
    > I'm sure they'll claim they have valid business reasons.

    i wish that the community had the means to do revenue sharing with such
    folks. carrying someone else's TE routes is a global cost for a point
    benefit.

    -- 
    Paul Vixie
    

  • Next message: Paul Vixie: "Re: NAT Multihoming (was:Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD