Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted

From: Kradorex Xeron (no email)
Date: Sat Jun 02 2007 - 03:31:17 EDT

  • Next message: Nathan Ward: "Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted"

    On Saturday 02 June 2007 01:09, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
    > On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Randy Bush wrote:
    > > >> how much of the v4 prefix count is de-aggregation for te or by TWits?
    > > >> why won't they do this in v6?
    > > >
    > > > wee, lookie! redistribute connected
    > >
    > > whee! lookie! minds disconnected, at least from public good.
    >
    > Yes :( sadly I suspect that is not the only mistake/misconfig/malconfig
    > happening in the world :(

    Doesn't everything that require a configuration have someone who eventually
    screws it up? :P

    It's a case of Murphy's law - If something can go wrong, it will - You just
    have to deal with the result and recover gracefully.


  • Next message: Nathan Ward: "Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD