Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted

From: Randy Bush (no email)
Date: Fri Jun 01 2007 - 21:51:45 EDT

  • Next message: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted"

    > For multi-homed sites, none. For the vast majority of singly-homed
    > end locations, the PA-based sites are all going to aggregate nicely
    > whereas all those /32's are going to come from wherever someone
    > can find a single unique address.

    most likely their provider. slicing the bits finer because of their
    scarcity, and putting nats behind, them does not mean that the provider
    will not give them to you.

    randy


  • Next message: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD