Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec

From: Joe Maimon (no email)
Date: Mon May 07 2007 - 22:01:29 EDT

  • Next message: Adrian Chadd: "Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec"

    Adrian Chadd wrote:

    > On Mon, May 07, 2007, Joe Maimon wrote:
    >
    >>
    >>
    >>Joe Maimon wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>>
    >>>This is obviously not best effort. Best guess would be "managed
    >>>bandwidth" differentiated by ip ranges and that the "change" was a
    >>>different pool assignment.
    >>>
    >>>I suspect the stellar icmp echo performance is also intentional.
    >>
    >>Or it could just be some QOS policing/shaping.

    I was referring to policing/shaping on the providers network, probably
    well in advance of the broadband agg network.

    The 871 is doing a bit of cookie-cutter qos, but that hasnt changed.


  • Next message: Adrian Chadd: "Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD