Re: BOGON Announcement question

From: Chris L. Morrow (no email)
Date: Mon May 07 2007 - 14:45:38 EDT

  • Next message: Peter Dambier: "Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec"

    On Mon, 7 May 2007, Danny McPherson wrote:

    >
    >
    > On Apr 30, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
    >
    > >
    > > On Apr 30, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
    > >
    > >>> Collector: CIXP
    > >>> Prefix: 128.0.0.0/2
    > >>> Last update time: 2007-04-27 07:36:30Z
    > >>> Peer: 192.65.185.140
    > >>> Origin: 29222
    > >>>
    > >>> My question is, why am I not seeing more issues because of the
    > >>> announcement?
    > >>
    > >> because everyone with enough clue to watch what they receive has
    > >> filters in
    > >> place to prevent their hearing it?
    > >
    > > And even if they didn't, what important IP space in that /2 is not
    > > covered by more specifics?
    >
    > A whole lot if any of those more specific were withdrawn and
    > the /2 were to pick up for them...

    BGP routing table entry for 2.0.0.0/24, version 686581
    Paths: (19 available, best #17, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
      Not advertised to any peer
      7018 1299 34211 41856 41856, (received-only)
        12.0.1.63 from 12.0.1.63 (12.0.1.63)
          Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external
          Community: 7018:5000

    what about these fun things? :)


  • Next message: Peter Dambier: "Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD