Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsec

From: Joe Maimon (no email)
Date: Mon May 07 2007 - 10:39:47 EDT

  • Next message: dan: "Load balancing"

    Scott Weeks wrote:

    > --- wrote:
    > From: "Lincoln Dale" <>
    > To: "'Joe Maimon'" <>
    >
    >>The standard control plane arguments dont apply
    >>when the pattern holds all the way through to
    >>equipment under your {remote-}control.
    >
    > :
    > : it most certainly does. lets use an example
    > : network of:
    > : F
    > : |
    > :A---B---C---D---E
    > : |
    > : G
    > :
    > :
    > : you are looking at ICMP/traceroute responses
    > : through sending traffic to/from A & E.
    > :
    > :for all you know, there may be an ICMP DDoS attack
    >
    >
    >
    > What about something as simplistic as tcptraceroute?

    My apologies for not making it clear that I had used that tool with the
    same results at the same time on ports 80, 22 and 23. With large and
    small packet sizes.

    > It won't give you path MTU info, but there're other tools that can.
    >
    > scott
    >
    >


  • Next message: dan: "Load balancing"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD