Re: Ratio between Number of Radius Accouting Server and Number of Radiuis Authentication Server

From: Joe Shen (no email)
Date: Thu May 03 2007 - 22:23:31 EDT

  • Next message: John Kinsella: "Re: Warning about UltraDNS terms"

    We establish two server farm which service on two IP.
    BAS use that two IP as AAA server addresses.
    Currently , number of accouting server is much less
    than authentication server although DB connection
    allocated to accouting server is nearly the same to
    authentication servers.

    The problem is, radius server responding speed may
    become very slow ( more than 100s) at peak time. some
    of radius accouting packets overflows when they are
    sent to radius server process queue. As radius
    responding speed is slow, BAS retransmit those packets
    in queue, the system performance worsen for
    duplicated packets. some dial-session is not closed
    normally because Accouting-off packets are lost or
    overflowed.

    I plan to deal with the problem by starting at
    incoming packets rate measurement, and server
    structure optimization. But, there seems to be too
    few material available.

    Joe

    --- K K <> wrote:

    >
    > On 5/3/07, Joe Shen <> wrote:
    > > Is there any recommendation on Ratio between
    > number of
    > > radius accouting server and number of radius
    > > authentication server, if accouting and
    > authentication
    > > are executed by different hardware platform ?
    >
    > I generally deploy just two accounting servers,
    > because (most)
    > RADIUS-enabled devices deal with
    > caching/retransmitting accounting
    > data in a reasonable fashion if the accounting
    > servers are slow or
    > unresponsive -- users won't notice if Accounting is
    > slow, quite the
    > opposite of Authentication.
    >
    > Many (most?) RAS/VPN/etc devices only support
    > configuring two RadAcct
    > servers, even devices which offer up to 4 total auth
    > servers might
    > only allow 2 for accounting. Also keep in mind that
    > some devices use
    > a primary/backup configuration, while other
    > implementations send all
    > Accounting records to *both* servers at all times.
    >
    >
    > > Is there any way to estimate the burst rate of
    > radius
    > > protocol packet in ISP network?
    >
    > You can calculate your burst rate by either
    > post-processing the RADIUS
    > event logs from the servers, or from NetFlow data.
    > The real-world PPS
    > rate and BPS for RADIUS should be very low, even on
    > a busy ISP -- our
    > biggest problem with RADIUS traffic isn't the
    > traffic itself, but
    > rather giving the protocol priority on congested WAN
    > links so it isn't
    > dropped by an oversubscribed router. Dropped
    > packets are primarily a
    > problem for authentication requests, particularly if
    > you're using
    > RADIUS with SecurID (due to the built-in
    > multi-second delay ACE/Server
    > forces for all authentication requests, RADIUS or
    > otherwise).
    >
    > Kevin
    >
    > --
    > Moderator, unofficial RSA ACE/Server + SecurID users
    > group:
    > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/securid-users/
    >

          
    __________________________________
    Yahoo! Movies - Search movie info and celeb profiles and photos.
    http://sg.movies.yahoo.com/


  • Next message: John Kinsella: "Re: Warning about UltraDNS terms"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD