Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons

From: (no name) (no email)
Date: Thu Mar 01 2007 - 21:52:16 EST

  • Next message: Adrian Chadd: "Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons"

    On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 21:08:59 EST, "Steven M. Bellovin" said:
    > On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:22:37 +0000 (GMT)> "Chris L. Morrow" <> wrote:
    > > So, where are static bogon filters appropriate? (loaded question
    > > perhaps) I ask because just about every 'security expert' and
    > > 'security whitepaper' or 'security suggestions' has some portion that
    > > speaks to "why it's a grand idea to have acl-lines/firewall-policy tp
    > > block 'bogon' ip space" (for some definition of 'bogon' of course).

    > Well, not all of us advocate that; see
    > http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/2006-01/msg00150.html

    Well Steve, it's like this: There are (a) security experts, (b) "security
    experts", and (c) guys that spend their day making things usable in spite of
    what the rest of the net throws in their AS's direction. You're an example of
    one, I'm an example of another, and the advocates of static bogon filters are
    an example of the third. Figuring out which is which is left as an exercise
    for the reader...




  • Next message: Adrian Chadd: "Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD