Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons

From: Chris L. Morrow (no email)
Date: Thu Mar 01 2007 - 14:33:56 EST

  • Next message: Jon Lewis: "Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons"

    On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Roland Dobbins wrote:

    >
    >
    > On Mar 1, 2007, at 6:22 AM, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
    >
    > > So, where are static bogon filters appropriate?
    >
    > #define static
    >
    > Obviously, one's bogon filters (both for iACLs and for prefix-lists
    > or whatever other mechanism one uses to filter the route
    > announcements one accepts) must be dynamic enough in nature to
    > accommodate updates when new blocks are cracked open. 'Static'
    > shouldn't be read as 'eternal', although that's often what ends up
    > happening.

    I absolutely agree, but without some tool or process to follow... we get
    stuck acls/filters and no idea that there is a problem until it's far into
    the problem :(


  • Next message: Jon Lewis: "Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD