Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons

From: Roland Dobbins (no email)
Date: Thu Mar 01 2007 - 09:32:04 EST

  • Next message: Gregory Edigarov: "Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons"

    On Mar 1, 2007, at 6:22 AM, Chris L. Morrow wrote:

    > So, where are static bogon filters appropriate?

    #define static

    Obviously, one's bogon filters (both for iACLs and for prefix-lists
    or whatever other mechanism one uses to filter the route
    announcements one accepts) must be dynamic enough in nature to
    accommodate updates when new blocks are cracked open. 'Static'
    shouldn't be read as 'eternal', although that's often what ends up
    happening.

    ;>

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Roland Dobbins <> // 408.527.6376 voice

               The telephone demands complete participation.

                           -- Marshall McLuhan


  • Next message: Gregory Edigarov: "Re: Where are static bogon filters appropriate? was: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD