- Previous message: Paul Vixie: "Re: what the heck do i do now?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Paul Vixie (no email)
Date: Thu Feb 01 2007 - 15:31:25 EST
(Brian Wallingford) writes:
> Ultimately, the problem is that the idealism which was more or less the
> rule a decade ago has taken a backseat to commercialism ...
i dunno about that. i see a lot of idealism still. volunteers at spamhaus,
and within the da/mwp community, and at cymru, are still going quite strong.
and in an odd twist of fate's knife, i still hold the "cix.net" domain which
was very quiet until COX went into the internet business a few years back.
since "i" and "o" are adjacent in qwertyland, i get a whole lotta misdirected
e-mail, including a lot of 1x1 correspondance from folks who mistyped their
source-email-address in their e-mail reader and then proceeded to correspond.
rather than bounce it all, i answer it with the following template:
there is no such person here at cix.net.
try cox.net.
re:
and then i include-all the mail they sent to me by mistake. eventually i
got tired of explaining to the senders why "" was answering their
e-mail, and so i started forging the source of my response to be the cix.net
address they were trying to reach. i've got it all down to a couple of MH-E
keystrokes and macros and e-lisp functions now. i just don't like the idea
of bouncing the stuff outright, since a lot of the senders will never guess
what went wrong. (i also appreciate the extra spam, for robot-training use.)
it's only a dozen messages a day, on average, and thus: idealism isn't dead.
-- Paul Vixie
|
|
|