Re: the authors of RFC 2317 have a question for at&t worldnet

From: Albert Meyer (no email)
Date: Thu Feb 01 2007 - 13:05:44 EST

  • Next message: Joe Maimon: "Re: Best way to supply colo customer with specific provider"

    I'm not from AT&T, but that page contains three errors and three "What to do"
    sections. The section referring to RFC 2317 is for DNS errors:

    “550 Error. Blocked for status: <unknown sender>”: This error indicates that no
    identifying information has been entered into the DNS (Domain Name System) for
    this sending system. The AT&T Worldnet mail system, like many others, does not
    accept messages from mail systems with no DNS records.

    The "Spam complaint" section has a different "What to do:"

    What to do: Ask the administrator of your mail system to contact us through our
    System Administrators' page and provide the information we need to investigate
    the problem.

    Paul Vixie wrote:
    > What to do: Ask your system administrator to submit identifying information
    > to the DNS. For more information, your administrator should refer to
    > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2317.html In the meantime, you should use a
    > fully registered domain for sending your messages, such as the mail system
    > from an ISP or one of the major free e-mail services.
    >
    > now, i count myself as a master of the obscure reference, but this is over
    > the top. can someone from at&t worldnet please contact me for the purpose
    > of explaining what RFC 2317 could possibly have to do with spam complaints?


  • Next message: Joe Maimon: "Re: Best way to supply colo customer with specific provider"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD