From: Rich Kulawiec (no email)
Date: Thu Feb 01 2007 - 07:25:23 EST
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 07:04:37PM -0800, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> (As an example, consider what happens *to you*
> if a hospital stops getting emailed results back from their outside
> laboratory service because their "email firewall" is checking your
> server, and someone dies as a result of the delay)
A hospital which relies on email for laboratory results is obviously
negligent. They should know that email is "best-effort", no better, and
that as a result it's an unreliable transport medium. (And increasingly
so given the massive abuse being heaped on it as well as any number of
ill-conceived "anti-abuse" ideas (C/R, callbacks) that actually make
the problem worse.) Using it for life-critical data is foolish.
There are much better choices available (including offline ones such as
FedEx) for the transfer for critical information.
---Rsk
|
|
|