Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

From: Mikael Abrahamsson (no email)
Date: Sun Jan 14 2007 - 02:55:14 EST

  • Next message: Bill Woodcock: "AFP article on Taiwan cable repair effort"

    On Sat, 13 Jan 2007, Roland Dobbins wrote:

    > again a la the warez community. It's an interesting question as to whether
    > or not the energy and 'professional pride' of this group of people could
    > somehow be harnessed in order to provide and distribute content legally (as
    > almost all of what people really want seems to be infringing content under
    > the current standard model), and monetized so that they receive compensation
    > and essentially act as the packaging and distribution arm for content
    > providers willing to try such a model. A related question is just how

    You make a lot of very valid points in your email, but I just had to
    respond to the above. The only reason they have for ripping, adremoving
    and distributing TV series over the internet is because there is no legal
    way to obtain these in the quality they provide. So you're right, they
    provide a service people want at a price they want (remember that people
    spend quite a lot of money on harddrives, broadband connections etc to
    give them the experience they require).

    If this same experience could be enjoyed via a VoD box from a service
    provider at a low enough price that people would want to pay for it (along
    the prices I mentioned earlier) I am sure that a lot of regular people
    would switch away from getting their content via P2P and get it directly
    from the source. Why go over ripping, ad-removing, xvid-encoding,
    warez-scene, then to P2P sites, then you have to unpack the content to
    watch it, perhaps on your computer, when the content creator is sitting
    there on a perhaps 50-100 megabit/s MPEG stream of the content that you
    directly could create a high VBR MPEG4 stream from via some replication
    system, and then VoD to your home via your broadband internet connection?

    There is only one reason for those people doing what they do, it's because
    the content owners want to control the distribution channel and they're
    not realising they never will be able to do that. DRM has always failed,
    systems like Macrovision, region coding (DVD), encryption (DVD) and now I
    read that the HDDVD system, are all broken and future systems will be
    broken.

    So the key is convenience and quality at a low price, aka
    price/performance on the experience. Make it cheap and convenient enough
    that the current hassle is just not worth it.

    -- 
    Mikael Abrahamsson    email: 
    

  • Next message: Bill Woodcock: "AFP article on Taiwan cable repair effort"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD