RE: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

From: Frank Bulk (no email)
Date: Fri Jan 12 2007 - 10:05:56 EST

  • Next message: Frank Bulk: "RE: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?"

    If we're becoming a VOD world, does multicast play any practical role in
    video distribution?

    Frank

    -----Original Message-----
    From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of
    Michal Krsek
    Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 2:28 AM
    To: Marshall Eubanks
    Cc:
    Subject: Re: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?

    Hi Marshall,

    > - the largest channel has 1.8% of the audience
    > - 50% of the audience is in the largest 2700 channels
    > - the least watched channel has ~ 10 simultaneous viewers
    > - the multicast bandwidth usage would be 3% of the unicast.

    I'm a bit skeptic for future of channels. For making money from the long
    tail, you have to have to adapt your distribution to user's needs. It is not

    only format, codec ... but also time frame. You can organise your programs
    in channels, but they will not run simultaneously for all the users. I want
    to control my TV, I don't want to my TV jockey my life.

    For the distribution, you as content owner have to help the ISP find the
    right way to distribute your content. In example: having distribution center

    in Tier1 ISP network will make money from Tier2 ISP connected directly to
    Tier1. Probably, having CDN (your own or pay for service) will be the only
    one way for large scale non synchronous programing.

                Regards
                        Michal


  • Next message: Frank Bulk: "RE: Network end users to pull down 2 gigabytes a day, continuously?"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD