RE: Quick BGP peering question

From: Neil J. McRae (no email)
Date: Wed Jan 03 2007 - 08:01:28 EST

  • Next message: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: Phishing and BGP Blackholing"

    are you advertising them routes?

    If so then why wouldn't you expect traffic?

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of
    > James Blessing
    > Sent: 03 January 2007 12:43
    > To: nanog
    > Subject: Quick BGP peering question
    >
    >
    > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    > Hash: SHA1
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > Very simply : Would you accept traffic from a customer who insists on
    > sending 0
    > prefixes across a BGP session?
    >
    > J
    > - --
    > COO
    > Entanet International
    > T: 0870 770 9580
    > http://www.enta.net/
    > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32)
    > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
    >
    > iD8DBQFFm6S6R+KszLBLUT8RAm1zAJ0Tvm7yaw/3tMrYWbsbEVZTxgSYpACfWuZ8
    > bdI+Wum4MI+2MkwA6R0clxQ=
    > =I/xW
    > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  • Next message: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: Phishing and BGP Blackholing"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD