Re: CWDM equipment (current favorites) (fwd)

From: Adam Rothschild (asr+)
Date: Thu Nov 02 2006 - 20:17:22 EST

  • Next message: (no name): "Re: Urgent need for bandwidth in Chiswick/London"

    On 2006-11-02-19:16:36, Deepak Jain <> wrote:
    > 10G is fine, but a coarse step price-wise. (boxes that are 1U that
    > uplink 10G often have >10G of input traffic possible). I like being
    > able to plug optics in as we need more upink. If its not feasible,
    > well then. :)

    As there's no specification for 2.5 gigabit ethernet (that I'm aware
    of), and SONET gear with pluggable optics is likely out of your
    league, I'm afraid that's a decision you'll have to make. :-)

    There are plenty affordable[1] options available 1U for switches with
    10GE uplink ports. I've had good luck with the Extreme Summit x450.
    If you're a bit more daring, Allied Telesyn recently announced a
    switch with a similar port density, though lacking in the useful
    "bunch of SFPs rather than 10/100/1000 ports" configuration.

    More and more, I'm finding it difficult to justify deploying n x GE
    port-channels across dark fiber, when 10GE is a lot easier to scale
    and troubleshoot...

    -a (the other *WDM lightning talk author)

    [1] clarified as sub-$10k per unit, sometimes even in the ballpark of
        $5k with the correct discounts applied


  • Next message: (no name): "Re: Urgent need for bandwidth in Chiswick/London"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD