Re: CWDM equipment (current favorites) (fwd)

From: (no name) (no email)
Date: Thu Nov 02 2006 - 17:33:01 EST

  • Next message: Deepak Jain: "Re: CWDM equipment (current favorites) (fwd)"

    On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Deepak Jain wrote:

    > >> We need to place a new order for some new fiber builds and were
    > >> considering some other vendors. Especially in the nx2.5G and nx10G (are
    > >> CWDM x-cievers even available in 10G yet?) range. Anyone have any new
    > >> favorites?
    > > 2.5G are only slightly more expensive than 1G - if you have OC48 gear that
    > > is SFP-capable, by all means, use that.
    > >
    > > 10G CWDM is *rumoured* to exist, but I don't think there are any
    > > production ones yet. Feel free to correct me. 10G is all DWDM, and so far
    > > very pricy.
    >
    > I think this is the rub (regarding multirate optics). What I'd love to
    > be able to do is take a multirate optic and shove it into some 1U type
    > switch or router that takes several gigabits of a IP or Ethernet frames
    > and load balances them PPP or CEF style across a few 2.5/2.7G lambdas.
    > So say 10 gigabits of traffic over 4 lambdas. I don't need to replicate
    Well, that's how LX4 actually works internally - but you can't plug in
    your own optics for those 4 cwdm channels :(

    Why not just do 10G natively? (LX4 or DWDM or whatever?)

    > GE signaling or SONET signaling... just move the bits. I know this is
    > very easy (trivial even) at 1G signaling rates, I never understood
    > [other than for markup purposes] why the vendors don't let those uplink
    > ports be 2.5G capable.
    You *have* to deal with signaling somehow, because of regeneration of the
    signal, so you have to have your own kind of signaling (whether sonet or
    ethernet or ...) on these lambdas.

    -alex


  • Next message: Deepak Jain: "Re: CWDM equipment (current favorites) (fwd)"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD