Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering...

From: Ian Mason (no email)
Date: Wed Oct 11 2006 - 09:40:45 EDT

  • Next message: (no name): "Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering..."

    On 10 Oct 2006, at 22:54, Per Gregers Bilse wrote:

    >
    > [This isn't meant to be flippant or anything else of the kind, it's
    > a genuinely heartfelt thing, albeit maybe a bit off topic.]
    >
    > What all things computer related has needed from day one is a way
    > of pronouncing ("reading out loud") hexadecimal. My first computer
    > was a 6502, and I've resented numbers larger than FF since then
    > (been working with AMD Opterons for a couple of years now,
    > disturbing).
    >
    > If you print and read in hex, you don't need dots or any other
    > syntactic
    > aids, the human eye/brain can easily group the requisite number of
    > digits,
    > at least for the time being.
    >
    > The problem is that from and including A we can't talk about the
    > damned things any more -- we resort to spelling out each number, with
    > no inherent and natural feel for what we're taling about.
    >
    > An A380 has a maximum take-off weight of around 24E (two-four-E)
    > tonnes.
    > An A380 has a maximum take-off weight of around 590 (five hundred
    > and ninety)
    > tonnes.
    >
    > Solve that, and we don't need any new notations beyond subtle
    > groupings,
    > just like we group thousands and millions in decimal notation.
    >
    > - Per
    This is so, so off topic it's not true. I started this as an off-list
    reply
    to Per but I'm so pleased with my solution that I can't help sharing it.

    Take the solution from natural languages. Most languages I speak (or
    have
    a smattering of) have a regular or semi-regular way of pronouncing
    numbers.

    Single digit numbers have a unique name.

    10 (the base) has a unique name.

    Numbers from 11 to 19 have a name with a suffix and a sound similar
    to the terminating
    digit usually with a break from the rule for 11 and 12. (nine,
    nineteen) (fünf, fünfzehn)
    We'd regularize that and not have

    Two digit numbers with a zero in the lowest position have a name
    using, again, suffix and a similar
    sound to the name of the single significant digit involved. (four,
    fourty) (vier, vierzig)

    100 has a unique name. 1000 has a unique name. Multiples of either
    are said
    <digit name> <multiplier name>.

    That's enough rules apart from the rules for combining all the above
    rules.

    So, we just need:-
            1) Unique names for all the single digit numbers.
            2) A unique name for the base.
            3) A suffix sound for 1x form numbers.
            4) A suffix sound for x0 form numbers.
            5) As many unique names for x00000... form numbers as we feel we need.
            6) A combining rule(s).

    So:

            1) Use the english names for 0..9. A..F may need new names if
            combined versions sound too similar to the compound forms.

            2) 0x10 = hen

            3) Use the suffix -heen for 0x11 .. 0x1f

            4) Use the suffix -he for 0xX0

            5) 0x100 = hexdred, 0x1000 = hexdrend

            6) use the english combining rules

            7) Try lots of combinations and then revisit 1. e.g
            0xA0 becomes 'Aye'-he which sounds too much like eighty for
            comfort; so A may need a new name.

    So:

            0x5432 = five hexdrend, four hexdred and thirhe two.
            0x1017 = one hexdrend and sevenheen
            0x10000 = hen hexdrend

    Happy counting,

    Ian


  • Next message: (no name): "Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering..."





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD