Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering...

From: Michael Shields (no email)
Date: Tue Oct 10 2006 - 17:23:54 EDT

  • Next message: Per Gregers Bilse: "Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering..."

    On 2006-10-10 13:41:42, David W. Hankins wrote:
    > It is weird, to me, that people who have concerns about their
    > router's configuration syntax expect to be able to take this up
    > with the IETF, rather than their router manufacturer.

    Personally, I care less about which notation we choose to express
    four-byte ASNs than that *everyone choose one notation*. Choosing a
    mediocre notation and using it consistently would be better than having
    to live forever with multiple notations. Operating a heterogenous
    network is hard enough already.

    As to whether this is within the scope of the IETF, note that they are
    already going far, far beyond this in the Netconf WG, which is defining
    a complete router configuration protocol.
    http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/netconf-charter.html
    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-netconf-prot-12.txt

    -- 
    Shields.
    

  • Next message: Per Gregers Bilse: "Re: that 4byte ASN you were considering..."





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD