Re: Web typo-correction (Re: Sitefinder II, the sequel...)

From: Edward B. DREGER (eddy+public+)
Date: Fri Jul 14 2006 - 23:29:45 EDT

  • Next message: Stephane Bortzmeyer: "Re: www.gigablast.com"

    SS> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:38:31 -0500
    SS> From: Stephen Sprunk

    SS> Ever used Word or Outlook? They annoyingly "fix" words as you type without
    SS> offering multiple choices or even alerting the user that they're doing it.

    Yes. One of the first "features" that I shut off.

    SS> OpenDNS's typo-fixing service can supposedly be turned off, but I don't see
    SS> how that would work when you have multiple users behind a NAT or a recursive
    SS> server. There also may be hidden problems if an ISP pushes all of their
    SS> users onto this service and the users have no clue they've been "opted in"
    SS> or how to opt back out (and we all know how well "opt out" systems work for
    SS> email in general).

    *nod*

    SS> And that solves most of my objections, at least for HTTP. It still breaks a
    SS> lot of other protocols.

    ...which still poses problems that should not be ignored. I forked a
    subset of the main discussion in hopes of better idea organization.
    Other protocols should indeed be considered.

    It's a question of protocol-specific proxying when [at least for now]
    DNS returns protocol-agnostic answers.

    As a side note, I wonder how many users would notice a typo-intercepted
    HTTPS side and associated invalid/bogus certificate. I'm afraid the
    number would be rather low.

    SS> If web browsers consulted SRV records instead of blindly connecting to the
    SS> A, that would appear to solve everything: NXDOMAIN for the A but the HTTP
    SS> SRV could point to the typo-correction server. I'd not be inclined to argue
    SS> with such a setup, but it requires a refresh of every browser out there, so
    SS> it's not realistic.

    Agreed re the short term. However, SRV records have other uses -- why
    should MXes get all the special treatment? -- so I'm trying to put
    another tally in the "[potential] reasons to use SRV" column. Perhaps
    if the ball began rolling...

    Eddy

    --
    Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
    A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
    Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
    Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
    Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
    ________________________________________________________________________
    DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
     -*-  -*- 
    Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
    Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
    

  • Next message: Stephane Bortzmeyer: "Re: www.gigablast.com"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD