Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1

From: Christopher L. Morrow (no email)
Date: Tue Jul 11 2006 - 14:14:03 EDT

  • Next message: Daniel Golding: "RE: Sitefinder II, the sequel..."

    On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, WONG, Yuen-Fung wrote:

    >
    > Sometimes earlier this year someone announced this 128/1 and caused
    > heavy loading to our routers to rebuild the CEF. Would anyone filter
    > out this route (and other similar routes such as 0/1, 128/1, 0/2, 64/2,
    > .... up to /4, for example) as bogus routes?

    Do you not prefix-list customers? That'd have solved this, eh?

  • Next message: Daniel Golding: "RE: Sitefinder II, the sequel..."





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    		Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD