- Previous message: (no name): "Re: NANOG Spam?"
- Maybe in reply to: Joe Johnson: "NANOG Spam?"
- Next in thread: Peter Dambier: "Re: NANOG Spam?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Henry Linneweh (no email)
Date: Thu Jul 06 2006 - 12:11:36 EDT
I still comment here periodically when it is prudent to do so, I set this email account specifically for Nanog,
anticipating spam....
-Henry
sage ----
From: Dominic J. Eidson <>
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2006 8:14:58 AM
Subject: Re: NANOG Spam?
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Sabri Berisha wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 05:20:04PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > Finally, we crawled the archives of the big lists and have come
> > up with a list of subscribers who haven't posted in over 9 months, we
> > plan to set the mod bit on them too very soon.
>
> So people who are 'real' but lurk a loti should reply to this message so
> they don't get moderated :)
The question would be - if you're hit by the moderation bit, and post a
message that makes it past whatever moderator's criteria.. Do you then
lose the moderation bit, since you how have posted within the last 9
months, and thusly have (unmoderated) access?
Or maybe this is just an exercise in let's-fly-by-the-seat-of-our-pants...
- d.
--
Dominic J. Eidson
"Baruk Khazad! Khazad ai-menu!" - Gimli
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.the-infinite.org/
|
|
|