Re: DNS Based Load Balancers

From: John Payne (no email)
Date: Mon Jul 03 2006 - 11:55:46 EDT

  • Next message: David Temkin: "RE: DNS Based Load Balancers"

    On Jul 3, 2006, at 12:09 AM, Paul Vixie wrote:

    >
    > well, i see that fezhead is dead. but 3-party TCP is alive and well:
    > <http://www.cs.bu.edu/~best/res/projects/DPRClusterLoadBalancing/>.
    >
    > see also <http://www.tenereillo.com/GSLBPageOfShame.htm>
    > and <http://www.tenereillo.com/GSLBPageOfShameII.htm>.
    >

    Paul - I'm still eagerly waiting your reply to Patrick's questions.

    Here at least we finally have something to read other than relying on
    blind faith, but
    the author is so convinced DNS based GSLB doesn't work[1] (and gives
    good examples
    of why it doesn't). However, these are all pretty much theoretical
    examples, and there's
    no explanation of why DNS based CDNs do in fact work so well in
    practice[2].

    [1] FSVO "doesn't work" that is...
    [2] I was going to say "appear to work so well", but that's unfair
    use of sarcasm - I know just how well at least one CDN works :)


  • Next message: David Temkin: "RE: DNS Based Load Balancers"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD