From: David Temkin (no email)
Date: Sun Jul 02 2006 - 03:23:05 EDT
So, you guys have been pretty clear on what he shouldn't do.
What should he do as an alternative to using DNS for a proximity based
solution?
-Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of
Matt Ghali
Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 10:43 PM
To: Paul Vixie
Cc:
Subject: Re: DNS Based Load Balancers
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Paul Vixie wrote:
>> I'm soliciting recommendations for DNS based load balancers.
>
> my recommendation is: "don't do it." for background, see:
>
> http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2002/msg02168.
> html http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/current/msg03572.html
> http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/current/msg00671.html
> --
> Paul Vixie
Having implemented F5's 3DNS product for a large entertainment company,
I'd like to wholeheartedly agree with Paul.
Please, for the love of god, don't do it.
matto
--------------------------------------------<darwin><
Moral indignation is a technique to endow the idiot with dignity.
- Marshall McLuhan
|
|
|