Re: Best practices inquiry: tracking SSH host keys

From: Shumon Huque (no email)
Date: Sat Jul 01 2006 - 12:03:43 EDT

  • Next message: Paul Vixie: "Re: DNS Based Load Balancers"

    On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:28:49AM -0700, David W. Hankins wrote:
    > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:07:33PM -0700, Allen Parker wrote:
    > > Why not, on a regular basis, use ssh-keyscan and diff or something
    > > similar, to scan your range of hosts that DO have ssh on them (maybe
    > > nmap subnet scans for port 22?) to retrieve the host keys, compare
    > > them to last time the scan was run, see if anything changed, cross
    > > reference that with work orders by ip or any other identifiable
    > > information present, and let the tools do the work for you. Cron is
    > > your friend. Using rsync, scp, nfs or something similar it wouldn't be
    > > very difficult to upkeep an automated way of updating such a list once
    > > per day across your entire organization.
    >
    > _wow_.
    >
    > That's a massive "why not just" paragraph. I can only imagine how
    > long a paragraph you'd write for finding and removing ex-employee's
    > public keys from all your systems.
    >
    >
    > So, here's my "why not just":
    >
    > Why not just use Kerberos?

    I think that one possible answer to this question is that Kerberos
    is not well supported (if at all) on most commercial routers and
    switches. It would be nice to change that somehow.

    Of the routers that we use (cisco, Juniper, foundry, extreme) only
    cisco supports Kerberos (specifically Kerberized telnet), and only
    in some of their IOS images on some platforms. At least that was the
    case last time I checked. I'd love to be corrected ..

    The cisco implementation also had some deployment issues for us (poor
    integration with authz mechanisms among other things). And during a
    competitive eval a few years back, one router vendor even delivered
    to us a signed letter from the CEO promising that they'd implement
    Kerberized telnet in a few months. They still haven't delivered. That's
    the last time we fall for that trick :-)

    I don't know of any vendors that have Kerberized ssh on their
    roadmaps. SSH2 with gssapi key exchange, RFC 4462 would be ideal,
    which we do run on a variety of UNIX servers here.

    As for verifying host keys with SSH, there is one project that
    provides x.509 certificate authority integration for openssh:

            http://www.roumenpetrov.info/openssh/

    It can even check an OCSP server for revocation status! But
    presumably you'll have to get this functionality implemented
    on your router's ssh server ..

    ---
    Shumon Huque				3401 Walnut Street, Suite 221A,
    Network Engineering			Philadelphia, PA 19104-6228, USA.
    Information Systems & Computing		(215)898-2477, (215)898-9348 (Fax)
    University of Pennsylvania / MAGPI.	E-mail: shuque -at- isc.upenn.edu
    

  • Next message: Paul Vixie: "Re: DNS Based Load Balancers"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD