- Previous message: Matt Ghali: "Re: AOL 421 errors"
- Maybe in reply to: Matthew Black: "AOL 421 errors"
- Next in thread: Matthew Black: "Re: AOL 421 errors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Matt Ghali (no email)
Date: Thu May 04 2006 - 13:47:28 EDT
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Joe Maimon wrote:
> <COUNTER-RANT>
> You know, people say things like this a lot. Its not relevant. What is
> relevant is how AOL is supposed to know that
>
> a) the email considered for rejection is actually wanted
> b) and wanted by AOL employees themselves
>
> And if they did know how to accurately determine that, we wouldnt be having
> this discussion.
The irony here of course, is that Matt Black's systems can't even
tell if they want the mail until _after_ the accept it- but that's a
feature, and AOL's in-transaction softfails are evil. Or something.
matto
--------------------------------------------<darwin><
Moral indignation is a technique to endow the idiot with dignity.
- Marshall McLuhan
|
|
|