Re: Usage-based billing

From: Peter Dambier (no email)
Date: Wed May 03 2006 - 17:50:37 EDT

  • Next message: Christian Kuhtz: "Re: Usage-based billing"

    ravi wrote:
    >
    > Hello all,
    >
    > read through the charter/guidelines and I believe (hopefully correctly!)
    > that my questions are not out of place. I am looking for advice on usage
    > based billing solutions. I am interested both in the data collector /
    > collection part and the billing part, and would ideally want separation
    > between these two parts (so that the collector could be used with
    > alternate billing systems, including in-house ones).
    >
    > Any suggestions on NetFlow/SFlow use? Tools (apart from Cflowd and
    > flow-tools)? Commercial solutions? What are the general concerns with
    > using NetFlow for billing? I understand I am asking a question that is
    > very wide in scope, but would appreciate even generic pointers in response.
    >
    > Also, Juniper provides a set of alternate Network Accounting Solutions
    > as their "response" to Flow-based accounting. Any pointers to comparison
    > of their solution with others? Experiences? Implementation documents?
    >
    > Thank you,
    >
    > --ravi
    >
    >

    How do you count DoS and SPAM? They are not wanted. Do you charge for them?

    Just a silly user question :)

    Kind regards
    Peter and Karin

    -- 
    Peter and Karin Dambier
    The Public-Root Consortium
    Graeffstrasse 14
    D-64646 Heppenheim
    +49(6252)671-788 (Telekom)
    +49(179)108-3978 (O2 Genion)
    +49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de)
    mail: 
    mail: 
    http://iason.site.voila.fr/
    https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/
    

  • Next message: Christian Kuhtz: "Re: Usage-based billing"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD