From: John Payne (no email)
Date: Tue Apr 04 2006 - 17:51:46 EDT
On Apr 4, 2006, at 10:34 AM, wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:43:20 EDT, John Payne said:
>
>> Bah, someone else mentioned them just recently. From my point of
>> view, all they seem to do is scattershot any addresses they can find
>> that's even remotely related.
>
> Given the fact that the type of places that the PIRT people need to
> notify
> are the kind of places that also have non-functional abuse@ addresses,
> do you have an actual *better* suggestion?
To *try* the *relevant* abuse@ addresses before scattershotting?
I'm talking about ME receiving a complaint from them about a Yahoo!
issue... that's how bad it is.
(No, I don't work for Yahoo!, my employer does have a relationship
with them, but we don't provide them IP connectivity).
|
|
|