RE: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant"

From: Frank Bulk (no email)
Date: Sat Apr 01 2006 - 16:54:33 EST

  • Next message: Sean Donelan: "Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant""

    Simon:

    Our regional head-end is adding MPEG4 in the next 3-6 months, so we're on
    the same bandwagon. Unfortunately, we've spent $$$ on MPEG2-only STB. It
    looks like we could be transport MPEG2 and MPEG4 around our local transport
    rings for a long time. We'll use the MPEG4 for customers who want HD, the
    rest will get upgraded as we can afford to.

    We have a few customers that have 4 or 5 TVs and want STBs for each one of
    them, and besides the fact that we have difficulty getting 20 Mbps on
    medium-range loops, we end up installing two modems because our BLC
    infrastructure is only configured for three streams. This will hopefully be
    resolves in future releases.

    Yes, there are quite a few MPEG4-capable STB vendors with lots of middleware
    vendors standing behind them, but I challenge you to document one
    STB/middleware combination in GA. I haven't seen it. Talk to me in six
    months, and it will be a different story.

    Frank

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Simon Lockhart [mailto:]
    Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 2:55 PM
    To: Frank Bulk
    Cc:
    Subject: Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant"

    On Sat Apr 01, 2006 at 01:26:51PM -0600, Frank Bulk wrote:
    > The majority of U.S.-based IP TV deployments are not using MPEG-4

    Agreed. However, I'd say that any IPTV provider currently using MPEG2 would
    be planning a migration to MPEG4/H.264 - half the bandwidth means double the
    channels.

    > in fact,
    > you would be hard-pressed to find an MPEG-4 capable STB working with
    > middleware.

    I disagree. There are several MPEG4 capable STB available now, and they all
    have support of middleware vendors.

    > SD MPEG-2 runs around ~4 Mbps today and HD MPEG-2 is ~19 Mbps. With
    > ADSL2+ you can get up to 24 Mbps per home on very short loops, but if
    > you look at the loop length/rate graphs, you'll see that even with
    > VDSL2 only the very short loops will have sufficient capacity for
    > multiple HD streams. FTTP/H is inevitable.

    Anyone looking to do HD will be looking at H.264, and looking to bring the
    bandwidth requirement down to 8-10Mbps. That is certainly more practical
    with
    ADSL2+ deployments (unless you want more than one STB per DSL).

    Simon
    (Currently working on an H.264 IPTV deployment)

    -- 
    Simon Lockhart | * Sun Server Colocation * ADSL * Domain Registration *
       Director    |    * Domain & Web Hosting * Internet Consultancy * 
      Bogons Ltd   | * http://www.bogons.net/  *  Email:   * 
    

  • Next message: Sean Donelan: "Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant""





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD