From: Marshall Eubanks (no email)
Date: Sat Apr 01 2006 - 16:09:46 EST
Hello;
On Apr 1, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote:
>
> On Sat Apr 01, 2006 at 01:26:51PM -0600, Frank Bulk wrote:
>> The majority of U.S.-based IP TV deployments are not using MPEG-4
>
> Agreed. However, I'd say that any IPTV provider currently using
> MPEG2 would
> be planning a migration to MPEG4/H.264 - half the bandwidth means
> double the
> channels.
>
Also, I think that the majority of IP TV deployments right now are
not in the US.
>> in fact,
>> you would be hard-pressed to find an MPEG-4 capable STB working with
>> middleware.
>
> I disagree. There are several MPEG4 capable STB available now, and
> they all
> have support of middleware vendors.
In the last IPTV trade show I went to (TVoDSL in Paris in January), I
don't recall a single
MPEG STB or IPTV system vendor who wasn't either showing or promising
H.264 support.
>
>> SD MPEG-2 runs around ~4 Mbps today and HD MPEG-2 is ~19 Mbps.
>> With ADSL2+
>> you can get up to 24 Mbps per home on very short loops, but if you
>> look at
>> the loop length/rate graphs, you'll see that even with VDSL2 only
>> the very
>> short loops will have sufficient capacity for multiple HD
>> streams. FTTP/H
>> is inevitable.
>
> Anyone looking to do HD will be looking at H.264, and looking to
> bring the
> bandwidth requirement down to 8-10Mbps. That is certainly more
> practical with
> ADSL2+ deployments (unless you want more than one STB per DSL).
Which you would in the US, but maybe not everywhere (yet).
>
> Simon
> (Currently working on an H.264 IPTV deployment)
> --
Regards
Marshall
> Simon Lockhart | * Sun Server Colocation * ADSL * Domain
> Registration *
> Director | * Domain & Web Hosting * Internet Consultancy *
> Bogons Ltd | * http://www.bogons.net/ * Email:
> *
|
|
|