Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant"

From: Marshall Eubanks (no email)
Date: Sat Apr 01 2006 - 16:05:05 EST

  • Next message: Marshall Eubanks: "Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant""

    I archive NTSC video in MPEG-2 at roughly 30 Mbps.
    That way, there are no worries about future codecs being too good for
    the archives.

    Regards
    Marshall

    On Apr 1, 2006, at 3:58 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote:

    >
    > On Sat Apr 01, 2006 at 08:43:54PM +0000, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
    >> I'm curious how program content is currently stored. (Note that I'm
    >> totally ignoring live broadcast.) If MPEG-2, I'd guess conversion to
    >> MPEG-4 might produce less-than-desirable image quality.
    >
    > Whilst MPEG-2 for broadcast purposes will be in the 3-5Mbps range,
    > MPEG-2
    > for archival/storage will be at a significantly higher bitrate. If
    > you're
    > storing at high bitrate MPEG-2, the transcoding to MPEG-4 will have
    > much
    > better results than if you transcoded from broadcast quality MPEG-2.
    >
    > Simon
    > --
    > Simon Lockhart | * Sun Server Colocation * ADSL * Domain
    > Registration *
    > Director | * Domain & Web Hosting * Internet Consultancy *
    > Bogons Ltd | * http://www.bogons.net/ * Email:
    > *


  • Next message: Marshall Eubanks: "Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant""





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD