Re: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant"

From: Jon Lewis (no email)
Date: Sat Apr 01 2006 - 14:02:13 EST

  • Next message: Frank Bulk: "RE: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant""

    On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, Marshall Eubanks wrote:

    > If AT&T is really claiming that their backbone has less than 15 Mbps
    > capacity (which is how "the backbone doesn't transport at those speeds"
    > reads in plain English), this is either

    Maybe they meant that the typical end-user windows IP stack has small
    enough TCP windows that when you take into account typical latency across
    the internet, those users just can't utilize their high bandwidth links
    due to the bandwidth * delay product.

    > - an April Fools joke or
    > - pitiful.

    Could be either. Did you happen to catch the woman from Verizon at the
    last NANOG who was sure parts of New Orleans were 2 miles below sea level?
    Maybe that was a really early AFJ.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      Jon Lewis | I route
      Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
      Atlantic Net |
    _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________


  • Next message: Frank Bulk: "RE: AT&T: 15 Mbps Internet connections "irrelevant""





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD