Time for IPv10? (was Re: Time for IPv8?)

From: Roland Dobbins (no email)
Date: Sun Mar 05 2006 - 22:50:56 EST

  • Next message: (no name): "Re: Time for IPv10? (was Re: Time for IPv8?)"

    [ It's been pointed out that, due to various historical reasons, IPv8
    might not be the best choice of version-number to use in this
    context. So, IPv10 can serve for purposes of discussion, in its
    stead. ]

    On Mar 5, 2006, at 7:19 PM, Roland Dobbins wrote:

    >
    >
    > On Mar 5, 2006, at 6:59 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
    >
    >> Far from it, but, there are lessons to be
    >> learned that are applicable to the internet, and, separating the
    >> end system identifier from the routing function is one we still seem
    >> determined to avoid for reasons passing my understanding.
    >
    > And this is the real answer, of course.
    >
    > There were two fundamental design decisions made back in the Olden
    > Days which continue to exert a strong and in many cases quite
    > negative sway over this entire set of inter-related issues:
    >
    > 1. Utilizing the endpoint identifier in the routing function, as
    > Vince Fuller and you (among others) have stated, and
    >
    > 2. The ships-in-the-night nature of the TCP/IP protocol stack.
    > This latter design decision is a big part of the reason TCP/IP
    > has been so successful to date; however, we find more and
    > more kludgey, brittle hacks to try and provide some sort
    > of linkages for purposes of enforcing policy, etc. The
    > irony is that these attempts largely stem from the unforeseen
    > side-effects of #1, and also contribute to a reinforcing
    > feedback loop which further locks us into #1.
    >
    > Given the manifold difficulties we're facing today as a result of
    > these two design decisions (#2 is a 'hidden' reason behind untold
    > amounts of capex and opex being spent in frustratingly
    > nonproductive ways), perhaps it is time to consider declaring the
    > 'Limited-Deployment IPv6 Proof-of-Concept Experiment' to be a
    > success, take the lessons learned (there are a lot more unresolved
    > and potentially problematic issues than those mentioned in this
    > thread) into account and get started on IPv8.
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Roland Dobbins <> // 408.527.6376 voice
    >
    > Everything has been said. But nobody listens.
    >
    > -- Roger Shattuck

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Roland Dobbins <> // 408.527.6376 voice

          Everything has been said. But nobody listens.

                        -- Roger Shattuck


  • Next message: (no name): "Re: Time for IPv10? (was Re: Time for IPv8?)"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD