Re: shim6 @ NANOG

From: Steven M. Bellovin (no email)
Date: Sun Mar 05 2006 - 20:34:09 EST

  • Next message: Roland Dobbins: "Re: shim6 @ NANOG"

    What Tony said, especially about what happened to 8+8. A lot of the
    grounds for rejection were security, but there wasn't a single security
    person on the committee. In my opinion, most of the arguments just
    didn't hold up.

                    --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb

  • Next message: Roland Dobbins: "Re: shim6 @ NANOG"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    		Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD