Re: shim6 @ NANOG

From: Joe Abley (no email)
Date: Sun Mar 05 2006 - 09:39:21 EST

  • Next message: Iljitsch van Beijnum: "Re: shim6 @ NANOG"

    On 4-Mar-2006, at 23:48, Roland Dobbins wrote:

    > On Mar 4, 2006, at 7:06 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
    >
    >> No support in big networks is required, beyond the presence of
    >> shim6 in server stacks.
    >
    > Why do you say this? Enterprises who multihome need their client
    > machines (tens and hundreds of thousands of them) to be able to
    > take advantage of multihoming, as well. It's a requirement, not a
    > luxury.

    You're missing the context; by "big networks" I was referring to
    those who are able to obtain PI addresses, following from:

    On 4-Mar-2006, at 16:31, Matthew Petach wrote:

    > And given that any network big enough to get their own PI /32 has
    > *zero*
    > incentive to install/support shim6 [...]

    [I didn't mean to imply that enterprise networks weren't big or
    complicated.]

    Joe


  • Next message: Iljitsch van Beijnum: "Re: shim6 @ NANOG"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD