Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)

From: Joe Abley (no email)
Date: Wed Mar 01 2006 - 10:45:18 EST

  • Next message: Brandon Butterworth: "Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)"

    On 1-Mar-2006, at 10:33, John Payne wrote:

    > On Mar 1, 2006, at 1:52 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
    >
    >> Shim6 also has some features which aren't possible with the swamp
    >> -- for example, it allows *everybody* to multi-home, down to
    >> people whose entire infrastructure consists of an individual
    >> device, and to do so in a scaleable way.
    >
    > Only if *everybody* has a shim6 capable stack...

    Not quite -- the practical usefulness of the multi-homing increases
    with the deployment of shim6-capable stacks. You could imagine a
    threshold of server and host upgrades which would provide useful
    multi-homing a good proportion of the time without universal deployment.

    If Linux and the currently-supported variants of Windows were to be
    updated to support shim6, and we waited through three or four widely-
    publicised security vulnerabilities which required OS/kernel
    upgrades, perhaps that would be sufficient deployment for the
    benefits of shim6 to be felt, most of the time. My hands are waving
    again, of course.

    I feel fairly certain I have exceeded some kind of unenforced posting
    threshold to this list in the last twelve hours. I will try hard to
    be quiet for a while, now :-)

    Joe


  • Next message: Brandon Butterworth: "Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD