North American Network Operators 0602
By Author

665 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]

Starting: Wed Feb 01 2006 - 00:33:08 EST
Ending: Tue Feb 28 2006 - 23:54:56 EST

• (no name)
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 14:27:48 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 18:07:06 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sat Feb 25 2006 - 03:41:01 EST)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 06:00:00 EST)
  • Re: Cisco 3550 replacement (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 05:25:06 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 11:02:11 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 10:56:19 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 08:46:21 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 08:05:35 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 08:03:38 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 05:08:51 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 04:58:16 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 01:41:58 EST)
  • Subject: drone armies C&C report - February/2006 (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 01:19:02 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 01:10:31 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 01:02:31 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 00:00:44 EST)
  • Re: Cisco 3550 replacement (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 22:54:47 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 21:52:27 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 20:42:45 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 17:34:40 EST)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 06:00:00 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 04:48:49 EST)
  • Verio (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 13:15:05 EST)
  • Re: keeping the routing table in check: step 1 (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 06:06:50 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 05:56:17 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 05:46:23 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 05:34:33 EST)
  • Re: reg-ops now becoming fully operational (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 05:10:21 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 11:30:01 EST)
  • Re: Interesting paper by Steve Bellovin - Worm propagation in a v6 internet (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 06:19:35 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 05:23:56 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 16:10:24 EST)
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 14:07:04 EST)
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:31:48 EST)
  • Re: Interesting paper by Steve Bellovin - Worm propagation in a v6 internet (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 10:45:13 EST)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 06:00:00 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 05:19:14 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 14:11:46 EST)
  • Re: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 05:17:47 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 04:43:57 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 04:35:55 EST)
  • Re: NetFlow tools? (Sun Feb 05 2006 - 23:59:28 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 11:52:34 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 10:32:33 EST)
  • The Cidr Report (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 06:00:00 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 22:39:59 EST)
• A Satisfied Mind
  • AT&T (AS7018) customer triggered blackhole routing? (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:14:01 EST)
• Aaron Daubman
  • Re: Cisco 3550 replacement (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 08:44:35 EST)
• Aaron Glenn
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 14:27:01 EST)
  • Re: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 14:57:28 EST)
• Alain Hebert
  • Re: SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 23:21:49 EST)
  • Re: SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 22:43:27 EST)
  • SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 14:42:58 EST)
  • Re: Problems connectivity GE on Foundry BigIron to Cisco 2950T (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 14:25:08 EST)
  • Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 16:43:51 EST)
  • Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 15:34:55 EST)
  • Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 13:01:27 EST)
• Albert Meyer
  • Re: The dissention grows towards AOL and pay per message (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 18:44:52 EST)
• Alex Rubenstein
  • Re: How do you (not how do I) calculate 95th percentile? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 15:24:09 EST)
• Alexei Roudnev
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 03:56:00 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 12:09:17 EST)
• Andre Oppermann
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 06:01:08 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 05:50:59 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 16:20:21 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 16:18:04 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 15:41:53 EST)
  • Re: ASNumber Extension for Firefox available (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 13:52:52 EST)
  • Re: ASNumber Extension for Firefox available (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:11:28 EST)
  • ASNumber Extension for Firefox available (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 08:44:13 EST)
• Andrew - Supernews
  • Re: NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.13 talk 3 NTT labs AAAA query explosion worries (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 16:41:45 EST)
• Andrew Dul
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 16:55:23 EST)
  • Re: IRS goes IPv6! (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 12:00:31 EST)
• Andy Davidson
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Thu Feb 23 2006 - 02:08:38 EST)
  • Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 10:04:32 EST)
  • Re: a truly radical proposal (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 07:33:32 EST)
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:14:11 EST)
  • Re: Password Security and Distribution (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 07:59:10 EST)
• Austin McKinley
  • Re: Did anyone else notice the CAIDA skitter poster in the background of George Bush's speech at the NSA? (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 12:22:54 EST)
• Barrett Lyon
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 22:02:17 EST)
• Barry Greene (bgreene)
  • RE: Did anyone else notice the CAIDA skitter poster in the background of George Bush's speech at the NSA? (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 10:49:31 EST)
• Bernhard Schmidt
  • Re: NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.12 talk 5 IPv6 --fear and GOSIP in Dallas (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 17:54:03 EST)
• Bill Fenner
  • Re: NANOG36 wireless issue (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 09:44:06 EST)
  • Re: NANOG36 wireless issue (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 13:06:45 EST)
• Bill Nash
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 14:07:36 EST)
  • Re: 95th percentile - the sociology study. (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 16:45:18 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 11:35:44 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 11:35:17 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 10:25:05 EST)
  • RE: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 19:25:24 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 19:02:22 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 18:20:06 EST)
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 12:20:25 EST)
  • RE: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:29:44 EST)
  • Re: Interesting netflow entry (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 14:13:18 EST)
  • Re: Interesting netflow entry (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 13:21:15 EST)
  • Re: Interesting netflow entry (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 18:19:59 EST)
• Bill Stewart
  • Re: SUMMARY - 95th percentile calculation (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 05:09:52 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 16:03:50 EST)
  • Re: MLPPP over MPLS (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 14:01:03 EST)
• Bill Woodcock
  • Re: Cisco 3550 replacement (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 22:31:29 EST)
  • Re: Exchange Points (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 03:08:40 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:08:54 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 13:45:47 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 13:41:00 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 23:55:30 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 22:30:16 EST)
  • Re: On the inoc-dba subject (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 16:47:12 EST)
  • RE: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 17:17:07 EST)
  • RE: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 16:33:58 EST)
  • Re: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 16:30:33 EST)
• Bora Akyol
  • RE: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 13:13:34 EST)
  • RE: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 20:33:15 EST)
• Brance Amussen
  • RE: Cogent (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 12:02:57 EST)
• Brent A O'Keeffe
  • Re: MLPPP over MPLS (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 08:56:47 EST)
• brett watson
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 14:06:02 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 13:42:24 EST)
• brokaw price
  • Bringing spouse/significant other to Dallas for NANOG? (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 00:49:55 EST)
• Bruce Pinsky
  • Re: IRS goes IPv6! (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 14:06:50 EST)
• Charles Cala
  • Re: SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 21:35:30 EST)
• Chip Mefford
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 14:37:44 EST)
• Chris Adams
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 19:58:12 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 15:04:24 EST)
• Chris Brookes
  • Re: The Domain Name Service as an IDS (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 19:39:52 EST)
• Christian Kuhtz
  • Re: Identify amount of traffic to special IP address in Radius (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 23:53:50 EST)
  • manet, for example (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 16:52:51 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 19:09:38 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 16:55:54 EST)
  • Re: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 10:45:55 EST)
  • Re: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 23:39:47 EST)
  • Re: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 23:15:32 EST)
  • Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 17:19:50 EST)
  • Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 15:38:57 EST)
• Christopher J. Pilkington
  • Disaster recovery using as-prepend? (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 09:56:43 EST)
• Christopher L. Morrow
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 14:29:16 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 13:50:29 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 16:04:15 EST)
  • RE: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Sat Feb 25 2006 - 15:09:22 EST)
  • Re: anybody here from verizon's e-mail department? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 12:31:21 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 21:12:07 EST)
  • Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 22:50:20 EST)
  • Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 16:25:16 EST)
  • Re: (OT) VERIZON NOC CONTACT PLEASE!!! (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 01:50:07 EST)
  • Re: IRS goes IPv6! (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:31:09 EST)
  • Re: AT&T (AS7018) customer triggered blackhole routing? (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:22:52 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 23:37:31 EST)
  • Re: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question... (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 22:07:58 EST)
  • Re: Interesting netflow entry (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 13:33:10 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 15:27:17 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 15:21:00 EST)
  • RE: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 12:30:59 EST)
  • Re: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 16:31:17 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 14:32:04 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 11:36:56 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 11:47:52 EST)
• Daniel Golding
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 23:37:34 EST)
  • Re: USG posts RFI re: IANAI (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 11:46:32 EST)
• Daniel Roesen
  • Re: How do you (not how do I) calculate 95th percentile? (Thu Feb 23 2006 - 10:32:09 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 05:51:12 EST)
• Dave Crocker
  • DKIM for ISPs (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 17:02:48 EST)
• Dave Howe
  • Re: ASNumber Extension for Firefox available (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:06:21 EST)
• Dave Pooser
  • Re: anybody here from verizon's e-mail department? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 11:17:28 EST)
• Dave Stewart
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 15:09:41 EST)
• David Barak
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 11:39:53 EST)
• David G. Andersen
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 10:33:19 EST)
• David Hubbard
  • RE: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:16:58 EST)
• David Meyer
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 16:26:00 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 13:41:32 EST)
  • Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 12:39:20 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 11:40:34 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 10:23:03 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 17:07:26 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 16:47:31 EST)
• David Nolan
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 14:39:37 EST)
• David W. Hankins
  • Re: How do you (not how do I) calculate 95th percentile? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 15:25:14 EST)
• Dennis Dayman
  • RE: anybody here from verizon's e-mail department? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 00:43:05 EST)
  • RE: anybody here from verizon's e-mail department? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 00:39:02 EST)
• Doug Marschke
  • RE: metric 0 vs 'no metric at all' (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 06:07:45 EST)
• Drew Weaver
  • Issues between Comcast (ATT) and GLBX? (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 13:01:43 EST)
• Edward B. DREGER
  • Re: ignore the word "radical" (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 17:35:39 EST)
  • ignore the word "radical" (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 14:30:23 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 13:32:59 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 12:36:22 EST)
  • RE: keeping the routing table in check: step 1 (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 23:23:23 EST)
  • keeping the routing table in check: step 1 (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 22:48:24 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 22:32:34 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 19:52:36 EST)
  • RE: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 19:33:39 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 17:27:31 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 16:57:00 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 16:44:46 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 15:59:39 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 15:56:01 EST)
  • Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 15:32:07 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 15:22:40 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 15:02:06 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 14:30:36 EST)
  • a truly radical proposal (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 13:05:50 EST)
  • Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 12:36:30 EST)
  • a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 12:13:28 EST)
  • shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 11:56:51 EST)
  • Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 15:46:37 EST)
• Edward W. Ray
  • RE: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 19:21:33 EST)
• Ejay Hire
  • RE: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 11:35:32 EST)
  • RE: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 13:30:29 EST)
  • Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 13:00:34 EST)
  • RE: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 15:53:23 EST)
  • Denial of service Attack. (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 08:39:38 EST)
• Eric Gauthier
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Thu Feb 23 2006 - 10:35:38 EST)
  • Re: Cogent (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 12:06:10 EST)
• Erik Amundson
  • RE: MLPPP over MPLS (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 15:27:22 EST)
• Estes, Paul
  • RE: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 13:14:51 EST)
  • DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 12:25:38 EST)
• Etaoin Shrdlu
  • Re: Gmail weirdness? (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 10:50:56 EST)
  • Re: Did anyone else notice the CAIDA skitter poster in the background of George Bush's speech at the NSA? (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 11:12:08 EST)
  • Re: Did anyone else notice the CAIDA skitter poster in the background of George Bush's speech at the NSA? (Sun Feb 05 2006 - 18:02:32 EST)
• Fergie
  • Maximun effective range of an excuse is... [Was: Re: Quarantine your i nfected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 12:27:56 EST)
  • Re: NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.13 talk 7 QoS in MPLS environments (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 18:27:58 EST)
• Florian Weimer
  • Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 10:10:02 EST)
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 14:15:46 EST)
  • Re: ml hacks for goodmail (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 17:08:06 EST)
• Frank Bulk
  • RE: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 20:45:06 EST)
  • RE: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 20:30:39 EST)
  • RE: ISP filter policies (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 10:20:22 EST)
  • RE: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 17:14:54 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 12:11:23 EST)
• Frank Louwers
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 10:38:39 EST)
• Fred Baker
  • Re: manet, for example (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 18:23:32 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 18:15:12 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 16:35:31 EST)
• Gadi Evron
  • Re: FYI - China To Launch Alternate Country Code Domains (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 18:54:08 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 13:50:14 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 13:19:18 EST)
  • phishing reporting by AS (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 09:23:55 EST)
  • announcement: reporting and mitigating botnets (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 07:37:31 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Thu Feb 23 2006 - 14:09:26 EST)
  • Re: The Domain Name Service as an IDS (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 21:27:52 EST)
  • The Domain Name Service as an IDS (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 07:23:04 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 09:01:16 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 08:32:58 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 07:35:52 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 07:33:57 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 01:06:57 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 00:17:38 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 00:01:57 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 21:15:25 EST)
  • botnets for good? [was: and here are some answers] (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 20:58:12 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 20:35:03 EST)
  • and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 19:27:05 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 17:57:15 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 17:54:33 EST)
  • Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 16:40:48 EST)
  • [operational update] Fast-Flux (fast IP changing hosts) (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 20:12:33 EST)
  • [operational update] Looking behind the smoke screen of the Internet (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 19:37:10 EST)
  • reg-ops now becoming fully operational (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 19:31:32 EST)
  • Re: ASNumber Extension for Firefox available (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 20:33:16 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 14:01:31 EST)
  • CAIDA analysis on CME-24/BlackWorm (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 15:44:51 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 18:43:17 EST)
  • Re: CME-24/BlackWorm email notifications - next TOP unreachables (Wed Feb 01 2006 - 00:28:31 EST)
• Greenhagen, Robin
  • RE: How do you (not how do I) calculate 95th percentile? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 20:01:38 EST)
• Gregory Hicks
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:50:43 EST)
  • Re: nanog.org website - 403s? (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 12:57:15 EST)
  • Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 17:41:26 EST)
  • Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 17:02:31 EST)
• Guy Tal
  • Re: Issues between Comcast (ATT) and GLBX? (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 15:33:03 EST)
• h k
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 13:56:22 EST)
• Henry Linneweh
  • RE: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 12:25:59 EST)
• Howard C. Berkowitz
  • Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 12:48:24 EST)
• Hyunseog Ryu
  • Re: MLPPP over MPLS (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 15:00:01 EST)
  • Re: MLPPP over MPLS (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 14:50:24 EST)
  • Re: MLPPP over MPLS (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 20:36:16 EST)
  • Re: MLPPP over MPLS (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 17:12:28 EST)
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:38:25 EST)
• Iljitsch van Beijnum
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 17:21:33 EST)
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 14:22:04 EST)
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 14:04:02 EST)
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 07:31:36 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 23 2006 - 13:58:52 EST)
• infowolfe
  • Re: Drone Army (how to contact)? (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 13:28:02 EST)
  • Drone Army (how to contact)? (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 05:10:02 EST)
• Ivan Groenewald
  • RE: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 11:21:47 EST)
  • RE: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 01:04:57 EST)
• Jack Bates
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Thu Feb 23 2006 - 09:02:31 EST)
• Jacky Lam
  • Cisco 3550 replacement (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 12:47:24 EST)
• James
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 12:06:05 EST)
• James R. Cutler
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 14:42:49 EST)
• Jared Mauch
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 16:37:03 EST)
• Jason Frisvold
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Thu Feb 23 2006 - 08:59:45 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 11:54:00 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 11:26:03 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 10:42:20 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 08:16:22 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 22:05:00 EST)
  • Re: MLPPP over MPLS (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 09:10:01 EST)
  • Re: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question... (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 15:24:30 EST)
• Jean-Francois Vaillancourt
  • Re: Cisco 3550 replacement (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 20:33:10 EST)
• Jeff Busch
  • RE: Cogent (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 12:04:25 EST)
• Jeff Rosowski
  • Re: Problems connectivity GE on Foundry BigIron to Cisco 2950T (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 12:50:00 EST)
• Jeff Shultz
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:20:30 EST)
• Jeffrey Haas
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:45:47 EST)
• Jeroen Massar
  • IRS goes IPv6! (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 03:06:26 EST)
  • Re: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 16:02:54 EST)
• Jess Kitchen
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 08:54:10 EST)
• Jim McBurnett
  • RE: ml hacks for goodmail (Sun Feb 05 2006 - 17:15:22 EST)
• Jim Segrave
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 04:29:12 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 10:25:13 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 06:26:00 EST)
• Jo Rhett
  • Re: 95th percentile - the sociology study. (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 17:21:51 EST)
  • 95th percentile - the sociology study. (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 15:10:29 EST)
  • SUMMARY - 95th percentile calculation (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 14:44:59 EST)
  • How do you (not how do I) calculate 95th percentile? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 13:12:39 EST)
• Joe Abley
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 12:09:14 EST)
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 11:28:24 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 12:02:38 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 00:13:48 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 12:44:27 EST)
  • Re: Google = Spam Source (was RE: Gmail weirdness?) (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 16:59:22 EST)
  • another exchange in Cairo (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:27:27 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 10:39:41 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:11:17 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 01:11:50 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 16:11:44 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 16:04:40 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 16:17:47 EST)
  • Re: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 16:19:43 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 15:51:55 EST)
• Joe Maimon
  • Re: anybody here from verizon's e-mail department? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 11:35:06 EST)
  • a not so radical proposal for PI in ip6 world: Hierarchial routing tables (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 09:01:55 EST)
  • stp questions (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 23:34:02 EST)
  • Re: On the inoc-dba subject (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 07:37:28 EST)
  • On the inoc-dba subject (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 07:16:23 EST)
• Joe McGuckin
  • Did anyone else notice the CAIDA skitter poster in the background of George Bush's speech at the NSA? (Sun Feb 05 2006 - 17:52:16 EST)
• Joe Provo
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sat Feb 25 2006 - 11:24:46 EST)
  • Re: The Domain Name Service as an IDS (Thu Feb 23 2006 - 10:33:39 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 23:24:36 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Sun Feb 05 2006 - 18:11:28 EST)
• Joe Shen
  • Re: FYI - China To Launch Alternate Country Code Domains (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 23:54:42 EST)
  • Identify amount of traffic to special IP address in Radius (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 22:55:48 EST)
  • dnsauth3.sys.gtei.net DNS record is poisoned??? (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 11:06:54 EST)
• Joel Jaeggli
  • Re: Gmail weirdness? (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 10:58:32 EST)
  • RE: Did anyone else notice the CAIDA skitter poster in the background of George Bush's speech at the NSA? (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 11:14:46 EST)
• John A. Kilpatrick
  • Re: ignore the word "radical" (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 16:02:14 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 21:51:16 EST)
• John Curran
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 13:24:32 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 08:45:01 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 07:45:36 EST)
• John Payne
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 17:15:37 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 12:05:35 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Wed Feb 01 2006 - 15:49:07 EST)
• Jon Lewis
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 11:53:06 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sat Feb 25 2006 - 16:42:07 EST)
  • Re: MLPPP over MPLS (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 15:38:16 EST)
  • Re: AT&T (AS7018) customer triggered blackhole routing? (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:12:28 EST)
  • TWTC as4323 full routes (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 15:11:44 EST)
  • Re: On the inoc-dba subject (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 11:07:45 EST)
  • Re: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 16:06:09 EST)
  • Re: 74/8 75/8 76/8 (Wed Feb 01 2006 - 22:25:16 EST)
• Jon R. Kibler
  • Re: MLPPP over MPLS (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 17:34:38 EST)
  • MLPPP over MPLS (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 14:36:48 EST)
  • Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 09:47:50 EST)
• JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
  • Re: announcing IXP mailing list in LAC region (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:42:39 EST)
• Joseph Nuara
  • Cogent (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:53:09 EST)
• Josh Karlin
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 11:08:07 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:04:50 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 16:55:50 EST)
• Justin M. Streiner
  • Re: flow -> web (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 00:01:42 EST)
• k claffy
  • Re: Did anyone else notice the CAIDA skitter poster in the background of George Bush's speech at the NSA? (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 16:02:07 EST)
• Kevin
  • NOC contact at OLM? (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 14:09:03 EST)
• Kevin Day
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 20:16:02 EST)
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 20:15:00 EST)
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 11:52:25 EST)
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 11:09:47 EST)
• Kim Onnel
  • Re: another exchange in Cairo (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 16:29:26 EST)
• Kurt Erik Lindqvist
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 10:38:42 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 06:08:14 EST)
• Larry Smith
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 11:38:04 EST)
• Lyons, Myke
  • [NANOG] Cogent problem in NYC area (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 06:01:02 EST)
• Majdi S. Abbas
  • NANOG36 PGP Key Signing (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 10:29:56 EST)
• Marco d'Itri
  • Re: NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.14 Tools BOF Notes (Sat Feb 18 2006 - 07:21:03 EST)
• Mark Andrews
  • Re: Interesting paper by Steve Bellovin - Worm propagation in a v6 internet (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 00:00:41 EST)
  • Re: Interesting paper by Steve Bellovin - Worm propagation in a v6 internet (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 22:09:25 EST)
  • Re: Interesting paper by Steve Bellovin - Worm propagation in a v6 internet (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 21:12:34 EST)
  • Re: Interesting paper by Steve Bellovin - Worm propagation in a v6 internet (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 18:12:59 EST)
• Mark Borchers
  • RE: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 10:44:12 EST)
• Mark Foster
  • Gmail multiple messages on mailing lists - resolved (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 23:49:52 EST)
  • nanog.org website - 403s? (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 04:09:42 EST)
  • The Groups.google thing and the dupe-delivery thing... (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 17:23:43 EST)
  • Google = Spam Source (was RE: Gmail weirdness?) (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 16:43:00 EST)
  • Gmail weirdness? (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 03:15:06 EST)
  • Re: SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 00:54:54 EST)
• Mark Owen
  • Re: Google = Spam Source (was RE: Gmail weirdness?) (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 17:07:45 EST)
  • Re: Gmail weirdness? (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 10:19:38 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 15:58:34 EST)
• Mark Radabaugh
  • Re: The Domain Name Service as an IDS (Thu Feb 23 2006 - 09:56:25 EST)
• Mark Smith
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Sat Feb 25 2006 - 17:26:26 EST)
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Sat Feb 25 2006 - 17:11:45 EST)
• Marshall Eubanks
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 15:10:50 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 16:59:15 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 13:10:43 EST)
• Martin Hannigan
  • Re: FYI - China To Launch Alternate Country Code Domains (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 19:33:37 EST)
  • USG posts RFI re: IANAI (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 09:27:40 EST)
  • Re: anybody here from verizon's e-mail department? (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 13:32:26 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 01:14:29 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 15:05:34 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:25:24 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:16:14 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 00:00:30 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 23:50:13 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 17:13:31 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 14:54:24 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 12:10:03 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 02:11:26 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 01:36:12 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 12:42:04 EST)
  • Re: 74/8 75/8 76/8 (Wed Feb 01 2006 - 23:38:56 EST)
  • Re: 74/8 75/8 76/8 (Wed Feb 01 2006 - 22:55:54 EST)
  • Re: 74/8 75/8 76/8 (Wed Feb 01 2006 - 15:58:43 EST)
  • 74/8 75/8 76/8 (Wed Feb 01 2006 - 15:36:31 EST)
• Matt Ghali
  • Re: reg-ops now becoming fully operational (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 14:26:53 EST)
  • Re: IRS goes IPv6! (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 14:11:03 EST)
• Matt Hess
  • XO opinions (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:28:17 EST)
• Matthew Kaufman
  • RE: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 00:56:53 EST)
  • RE: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 18:35:27 EST)
• Matthew Petach
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.15 talks 5-end Lightning talks, closing notes (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 13:27:05 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.15 talk 4 Interdomain Routing Consistency (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 13:25:02 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.15 talk 3 Katrina Panel (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 13:20:17 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.15 talk 2 Katrina--telecom infrastructure impacts (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 11:59:31 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.15 talk 1 ipv6fix (and boy, does it need it) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 11:58:00 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.14 Tools BOF Notes (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 00:13:10 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.14 talk 7 Randy IRR routing security revisited (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 15:42:53 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.14 talk 4 Flooding via routing loops (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 15:07:37 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.14 talk 3 Flamingo Netflow Visualization Tool (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 15:04:51 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.14 talk 2 Netflow Visualization Tools (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 15:00:47 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.14 talk 1 IRR power tools (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 14:56:34 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.13 talk 7 QoS in MPLS environments (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 18:19:02 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.12 talk 5 IPv6 --fear and GOSIP in Dallas (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 13:22:22 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.13 talk4 DNS infrastructure distribution (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:58:15 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.13 talk 3 NTT labs AAAA query explosion worries (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:56:31 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.13 talk 2 Duane Wessels, DNS cache poisoning (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:54:25 EST)
  • NANOG36-NOTES talk 1--steve feldman (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 11:52:29 EST)
  • Any interest in notes from the talks at NANOG? (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:02:35 EST)
  • 2006.02.12 Open Committee Meeting Notes (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 20:11:43 EST)
• Michael Loftis
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 17:28:51 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Thu Feb 23 2006 - 16:01:17 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Thu Feb 23 2006 - 12:18:16 EST)
  • Re: nanog.org website - 403s? (Sun Feb 12 2006 - 00:42:51 EST)
  • Re: nanog.org website - 403s? (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 12:29:43 EST)
  • Re: SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 15:47:38 EST)
  • Re: Bringing spouse/significant other to Dallas for NANOG? (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 01:54:11 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 17:54:15 EST)
  • Re: NANOG36 PGP Key Signing (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 17:50:04 EST)
  • Re: flow -> web (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 01:48:53 EST)
• Michael Painter
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 07:18:59 EST)
• Mikael Abrahamsson
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 05:24:59 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 18:12:56 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 10:31:56 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 10:16:38 EST)
• Mike Leber
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 00:04:26 EST)
• Mike Tancsa
  • Re: Cogent (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 12:02:35 EST)
• Mohsen A. Momeni
  • firewall authentication problem (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 04:17:14 EST)
• n3td3v
  • Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 15:09:38 EST)
• Nathan March
  • Re: AOL Megaproxies? (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 19:07:29 EST)
  • AOL Megaproxies? (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 18:58:59 EST)
• neal rauhauser
  • eastern Nebraska regional service problem (Sprint, AT&T, Qwest transport?) (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 15:16:12 EST)
• Neil J. McRae
  • RE: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Sat Feb 25 2006 - 13:23:17 EST)
• Nicholas Suan
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sat Feb 25 2006 - 05:08:53 EST)
  • Re: 74/8 75/8 76/8 (Wed Feb 01 2006 - 23:24:29 EST)
• Nick Feamster
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 23:27:13 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 02:05:32 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 16:45:45 EST)
  • Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 14:26:28 EST)
  • Re: So -- what did happen to Panix? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 14:15:45 EST)
• Nicole
  • The dissention grows towards AOL and pay per message (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 18:30:36 EST)
• Niels Bakker
  • Re: announcing IXP mailing list in LAC region (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:19:47 EST)
• Olivier Bonaventure
  • Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 11:02:40 EST)
• Owen DeLong
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 12:49:34 EST)
  • RE: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 00:23:16 EST)
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Sat Feb 25 2006 - 14:33:59 EST)
  • Re: USG posts RFI re: IANAI (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 11:05:19 EST)
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 22:11:01 EST)
• Patrick W. Gilmore
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Sat Feb 25 2006 - 11:04:12 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 14:13:32 EST)
  • Re: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 15:08:27 EST)
• Paul Jakma
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 21:05:23 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 18:41:15 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 15:46:33 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 14:02:11 EST)
• Paul Vixie
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 19:31:11 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 19:27:18 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 16:33:16 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 11:22:46 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 11:18:40 EST)
  • anybody here from verizon's e-mail department? (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 12:57:52 EST)
  • the great anti-virus conspiracy (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 20:08:45 EST)
• PC
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 11:32:48 EST)
• Peering
  • RE: MLPPP over MPLS (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 13:10:21 EST)
• Per Heldal
  • Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 15:14:03 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 14:45:33 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 07:56:52 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 18:47:04 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 15:13:32 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 14:55:04 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 11:40:09 EST)
• Pete Templin
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 08:53:40 EST)
  • NANOG36, Dallas, and I-35 (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 09:16:39 EST)
• Peter Corlett
  • Re: SUMMARY - 95th percentile calculation (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 16:23:52 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 06:57:23 EST)
• Peter Kranz
  • Cogent peering issues between San Jose and San Francisco (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 19:45:50 EST)
• Peter Wohlers
  • Re: flow -> web (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 00:10:36 EST)
• Rachael Treu Gomes
  • Re: Bringing spouse/significant other to Dallas for NANOG? (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 10:55:58 EST)
• Randy Bush
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sun Feb 26 2006 - 02:26:44 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 13:47:50 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 12:33:45 EST)
  • Re: anybody here from verizon's e-mail department? (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 13:37:57 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 18:25:19 EST)
  • Re: shim6 rides again (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 12:26:47 EST)
  • Re: nanog.org website - 403s? (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 17:21:33 EST)
  • Re: another exchange in Cairo (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 16:50:45 EST)
  • Re: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question... (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 22:15:59 EST)
  • Re: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question... (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 15:30:39 EST)
  • intergalactic nog (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 15:02:13 EST)
  • Re: flow -> web (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 03:24:58 EST)
  • Re: ml hacks for goodmail (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 22:22:27 EST)
  • ml hacks for goodmail (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 22:10:55 EST)
  • RE: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 17:09:42 EST)
  • flow -> web (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 23:57:58 EST)
  • Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 13:13:59 EST)
  • Re: 74/8 75/8 76/8 (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 00:10:14 EST)
• Ray Burkholder
  • RE: Cisco 3550 replacement (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 14:10:00 EST)
  • RE: Cisco 3550 replacement (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 14:08:24 EST)
• Ricardo Patara
  • Re: announcing IXP mailing list in LAC region (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 12:55:17 EST)
  • announcing IXP mailing list in LAC region (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 11:27:55 EST)
• Ricardo V. Oliveira
  • ISP filter policies (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 23:34:47 EST)
• Richard A Steenbergen
  • Re: Exchange Points (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 22:09:45 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 16:04:04 EST)
  • Re: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 15:59:04 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 14:10:26 EST)
  • Re: 74/8 75/8 76/8 (Wed Feb 01 2006 - 15:50:35 EST)
• Richard Cox
  • Re: ASNumber Extension for Firefox available (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 09:44:40 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 14:23:24 EST)
• Rick Wesson
  • FYI: reg-ops now becoming fully operational (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 02:13:30 EST)
• Rob Thomas
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 11:04:22 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sat Feb 25 2006 - 11:04:09 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 17:33:08 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 01:21:47 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 01:04:17 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 20:49:04 EST)
  • Re: NetFlow tools? (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 00:21:00 EST)
  • Re: 74/8 75/8 76/8 (Wed Feb 01 2006 - 16:09:32 EST)
• Robert E.Seastrom
  • Re: FYI - China To Launch Alternate Country Code Domains (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 21:36:48 EST)
• Rodney Dunn
  • Re: MLPPP over MPLS (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 08:56:00 EST)
• Roland Dobbins
  • Re: NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.14 talk 2 Netflow Visualization Tools (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 01:39:13 EST)
• Ronald W. Jean Jr.
  • LCP Echo in Cisco Environment (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 23:46:47 EST)
• Routing Table Analysis
  • Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 13:07:14 EST)
  • Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 13:07:07 EST)
  • Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 13:12:40 EST)
  • Weekly Routing Table Report (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 13:10:19 EST)
• Rubens Kuhl Jr.
  • Re: On the inoc-dba subject (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 07:31:44 EST)
• Russell, David
  • RE: How do you (not how do I) calculate 95th percentile? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 17:46:01 EST)
• Saku Ytti
  • Re: Cisco 3550 replacement (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 01:16:45 EST)
• Scott Morris
  • RE: keeping the routing table in check: step 1 (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 23:05:20 EST)
• Scott Weeks
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 20:33:51 EST)
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 14:10:24 EST)
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 13:47:32 EST)
  • Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 21:03:23 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 13:37:56 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 18:22:22 EST)
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 17:17:44 EST)
  • Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 20:04:31 EST)
• Sean Donelan
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 19:36:05 EST)
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 23:54:38 EST)
  • Re: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 10:27:52 EST)
  • RE: Triple Play [was: CAUTION: Potentially Dumb Question...] (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 23:17:45 EST)
  • Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 14:34:16 EST)
  • Another day another virus, not that virus the other virus (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 06:08:17 EST)
• Simon Waters
  • Re: and here are some answers [was: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware] (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 04:25:39 EST)
  • Re: ml hacks for goodmail (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 05:25:52 EST)
  • Re: Yahoo, Google, Microsoft contact? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 11:04:51 EST)
• sjk
  • Exchange Points (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 21:46:34 EST)
• Stephen J. Wilcox
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 14:03:25 EST)
• Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 14:23:08 EST)
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 14:29:25 EST)
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Sat Feb 25 2006 - 14:56:37 EST)
• Stephen Stuart
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 17:59:01 EST)
• Steve Atkins
  • Re: The dissention grows towards AOL and pay per message (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 20:29:06 EST)
• Steve Feldman
  • NANOG36 Wednesday schedule, lightning talks (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 23:51:29 EST)
  • NANOG36 wireless issue (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 12:29:18 EST)
  • Re: Lighting talks at NANOG 36 (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:24:10 EST)
  • Lighting talks at NANOG 36 (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:18:55 EST)
  • Lightning Talks at NANOG 36 (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 16:26:56 EST)
• Steven M. Bellovin
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Sat Feb 25 2006 - 09:00:17 EST)
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 11:51:22 EST)
  • Re: Interesting paper by Steve Bellovin - Worm propagation in a v6 internet (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 09:27:58 EST)
  • Re: ASNumber Extension for Firefox available (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 13:42:43 EST)
  • Re: ASNumber Extension for Firefox available (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 10:55:42 EST)
• Suresh Ramasubramanian
  • Re: anybody here from verizon's e-mail department? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 12:53:47 EST)
  • Re: anybody here from verizon's e-mail department? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 12:06:32 EST)
  • Re: anybody here from verizon's e-mail department? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 01:28:47 EST)
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 10:44:01 EST)
  • Re: Fed Bill Would Restrict Web Server Logs (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 09:59:29 EST)
  • Re: Interesting paper by Steve Bellovin - Worm propagation in a v6 internet (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 08:12:33 EST)
  • Re: NANOG36 wireless issue (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 07:24:32 EST)
  • Interesting paper by Steve Bellovin - Worm propagation in a v6 internet (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 07:22:43 EST)
  • Re: SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 23:26:48 EST)
  • Re: SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 22:49:48 EST)
  • Re: SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs (Thu Feb 09 2006 - 21:02:55 EST)
  • Re: On the inoc-dba subject (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 10:53:11 EST)
  • Re: ml hacks for goodmail (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 22:27:54 EST)
  • Re: ml hacks for goodmail (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 22:19:25 EST)
• Susan Harris
  • Dallas meeting stats (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 15:20:09 EST)
  • Draft Agenda for Dallas (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 16:06:18 EST)
• Todd Underwood
  • Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP (Thu Feb 02 2006 - 14:58:06 EST)
• Todd Vierling
  • Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne) (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 10:34:44 EST)
  • Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 17:07:59 EST)
  • Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 16:57:12 EST)
  • Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 15:55:47 EST)
  • Re: Interesting paper by Steve Bellovin - Worm propagation in a v6 internet (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 23:47:35 EST)
  • Re: Interesting paper by Steve Bellovin - Worm propagation in a v6 internet (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 20:46:22 EST)
  • Re: SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs (Fri Feb 10 2006 - 11:29:36 EST)
• tom
  • AW: flow -> web (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 03:43:46 EST)
• Tom Sands
  • Re: How do you (not how do I) calculate 95th percentile? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 17:18:08 EST)
  • Re: How do you (not how do I) calculate 95th percentile? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 13:50:34 EST)
  • Re: Cisco 3550 replacement (Mon Feb 20 2006 - 17:01:11 EST)
• Tom Vest
  • Re: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 15:30:24 EST)
• Tony Finch
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 08:24:25 EST)
• Tony Hain
  • RE: protocols that don't meet the need... (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 16:17:46 EST)
  • RE: protocols that don't meet the need... (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 16:08:23 EST)
  • protocols that don't meet the need... (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 15:35:19 EST)
• Vicky Røde
  • Re: Quarantine your infected users spreading malware (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 16:50:14 EST)
  • Re: IRS goes IPv6! (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 01:12:04 EST)
  • Re: NANOG36-NOTES 2006.02.14 talk 2 Netflow Visualization Tools (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 23:13:08 EST)
• Vince Fuller
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 17:37:47 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Wed Feb 15 2006 - 20:25:49 EST)
• Warren Kumari
  • Re: Transit LAN vs. Individual LANs (Mon Feb 27 2006 - 14:08:47 EST)
  • Re: How do you (not how do I) calculate 95th percentile? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 17:10:11 EST)
  • Re: How do you (not how do I) calculate 95th percentile? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 14:28:44 EST)
  • Re: Cisco 3550 replacement (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 12:27:20 EST)
  • Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 20:50:35 EST)
  • Re: Disaster recovery using as-prepend? (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 15:29:29 EST)
  • Re: nanog.org website - 403s? (Sat Feb 11 2006 - 12:56:24 EST)
• Wayne E. Bouchard
  • Re: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Fri Feb 03 2006 - 15:25:20 EST)
• Wayne Gustavus (nanog)
  • RE: anybody here from verizon's e-mail department? (Wed Feb 22 2006 - 09:14:00 EST)
  • RE: anybody here from verizon's e-mail department? (Tue Feb 21 2006 - 14:24:38 EST)
  • RE: Anyone heard of INOC-DBA? (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 11:55:43 EST)
• Wil Schultz
  • Re: Interesting netflow entry (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 20:04:06 EST)
  • Re: Interesting netflow entry (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 16:17:28 EST)
  • Re: Interesting netflow entry (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 19:30:33 EST)
  • Re: Interesting netflow entry (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 17:18:31 EST)
  • Interesting netflow entry (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 16:15:06 EST)
  • Re: NetFlow tools? (Mon Feb 06 2006 - 15:39:37 EST)
  • NetFlow tools? (Sun Feb 05 2006 - 22:59:06 EST)
• William B. Norton
  • Peering BOF XI Meeting Minutes ----- D R A F T (Fri Feb 17 2006 - 13:50:46 EST)
• william(at)elan.net
  • FYI - China To Launch Alternate Country Code Domains (Tue Feb 28 2006 - 12:43:16 EST)
  • Re: DNS deluge for x.p.ctrc.cc (Fri Feb 24 2006 - 12:46:35 EST)
  • Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...) (Thu Feb 16 2006 - 14:23:57 EST)
  • Re: protocols that don't meet the need... (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 20:12:03 EST)
  • Re: reg-ops now becoming fully operational (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 20:05:33 EST)
  • Re: reg-ops now becoming fully operational (Tue Feb 14 2006 - 20:04:33 EST)
  • Re: ASNumber Extension for Firefox available (Mon Feb 13 2006 - 13:30:50 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 12:30:25 EST)
  • Re: Middle Eastern Exchange Points (Wed Feb 08 2006 - 02:12:45 EST)
  • Re: FYI - RFC 4367 on What\'s in a Name: False Assumptions about DNS Names (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 21:01:49 EST)
  • FYI - RFC 4367 on What\'s in a Name: False Assumptions about DNS Names (Tue Feb 07 2006 - 20:55:17 EST)
• Yann Berthier
  • Re: flow -> web (Sat Feb 04 2006 - 03:46:17 EST)

Last message date: Tue Feb 28 2006 - 23:54:56 EST
Archived on: Tue Feb 28 2006 - 23:57:27 EST

665 messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ attachment ]