Re: Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober)

• Previous message: Tony Varriale: "Re: Receiving route with metric 0"
• Maybe in reply to: Daniel Senie: "Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober)"
• Next in thread: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 03:18:29PM -0800, Steve Sobol wrote:
> Blocking based on rDNS simply because it implies that a certain piece of
> equipment is at that address is... not advisable.

Agreed. Those blocks aren't in place because there's a certain piece
of equipment at those addresses (hostnames); they're in place because
all of them have emitted spam.

---Rsk

• Previous message: Tony Varriale: "Re: Receiving route with metric 0"
• Maybe in reply to: Daniel Senie: "Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober)"
• Next in thread: Rich Kulawiec: "Re: Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]