Re: Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober)

From: Steven M. Bellovin (no email)
Date: Sun Dec 04 2005 - 23:04:52 EST

  • Next message: Edward B. Dreger: "Re: Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober)"

    In message <>, "Chur
    ch, Chuck" writes:
    >
    >What about all the viruses out there that don't forge addresses?
    >Sending a warning message makes sense for these. Unless someone has
    >done the research to determine the majority of viruses forge addresses,
    >you really can't complain about the fact that the default is to warn.
    >Calling vendors 'clueless' because a default doesn't match your needs is
    >a little extreme, don't you think? The ideal solution would be for the
    >scanning software to send a warning only if the virus detected is known
    >to use real addresses, otherwise it won't warn.
    >

    A-V companies are in the business of analyzing viruses. They should
    *know* how a particular virus behaves.

                    --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb


  • Next message: Edward B. Dreger: "Re: Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober)"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD