- Previous message: Fred Baker: "Re: New Rules On Internet Wiretapping Challenged"
- Maybe in reply to: Daniel Golding: "SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
|
|
|
From: Wayne Gustavus (nanog) ("Wayne)
Date: Thu Nov 03 2005 - 13:49:47 EST
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:] On
> Behalf Of David Barak
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:18 PM
> To: NANOG list
> Subject: Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions
>
<snip>
> like to point out for the record that none of the
> recent depeering battles have involved any RBOCs...
>
Which makes sense when you consider much of the current traffic flows.
It gets even more interesting when you look at the fast-increasing
number of fat FiOS pipes. When you take
(edonkey/kazaa/ptp-du-jour)+FiOS you get a network of distributed
'content providers'.
Reference the earlier post about broadband getting a lot less
interesting w/o the content. Well this rings true when you weigh the
traffic load of 100K's of users poking around in a portal vs. 100K's of
users 'shopping' for music & movies!
___________________________________________________________
Wayne Gustavus, CCIE #7426
IP Operations Support
Verizon Internet Services
___________________________________________________________
"Can you ping me now? Good!"
|
|
|