Re: cogent+ Level(3) are ok now

From: Pete Templin (no email)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 15:44:20 EST

  • Next message: Vicky Rode: "Re: New Rules On Internet Wiretapping Challenged"

    Richard A Steenbergen wrote:

    > Yes with enough time and energy (or a small enough network) you *can* beat
    > perfect MEDs out of the system (and your customers). You can selectively
    > deaggregate the hell out of your network, then you can zero out all the
    > known aggregate blocks and regions that are in the middle of two
    > MED-speaking interconnection points, and get your customers to tag
    > aggregate blocks announced in multiple locations so that you can zero out
    > those MEDs. With enough time and energy anything is possible, the point is
    > that most folks don't consider it to be worth the time, let alone the
    > customer anger when it degrades your traffic.

    I came up with a reasonably scalable solution using communities and
    route-map continue, but:

    CSCsc36517
    Externally found severe defect: New (N)
    Bus Error reload after configure route-map and then clear bgp neighbor

    Release-note:
    ============
    When a bgp route-map is configured on the router and then "clear ip bgp
    neighbor.." command is executed router experiences Unexpected Reload due
    to Bus Error. Currently there is no other workaround other than to
    prevent executing the "clear ip bgp neighbor" command.

    ...kinda gets in my way. For what it's worth, it doesn't even require
    "clear ip bgp <ne>" to crash the box.

    Joy.

    pt


  • Next message: Vicky Rode: "Re: New Rules On Internet Wiretapping Challenged"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD