From: David Barak (no email)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 14:17:45 EST
--- Randy Bush <> wrote:
> if i am a paying sbc or other foopoloy dsl customer
> and i go
> to <http://content.provider>, why should
> content.provider pay
> to give the sbc paying customer what they're already
> charged
> for?
There is one scenario where the content.provider is
paying the carrier as well - when the content.provider
is a direct customer of the carrier, rather than being
either a SFI-peer or a customer of an SFI-peer.
This of course goes back to the question of
depeering/transit/etc which we beat to death a couple
of weeks ago - many carriers want to get paid both by
the sources and sinks of traffic (it's certainly an
understandable, if unlikely, desire). I would just
like to point out for the record that none of the
recent depeering battles have involved any RBOCs...
-David Barak
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
|
|