Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions

From: Christian Kuhtz (no email)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 10:21:12 EST

  • Next message: Brandon Butterworth: "Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions"

    On Nov 2, 2005, at 9:54 AM, Daniel Golding wrote:
    >
    > They ARE using your pipes right now, and they AREN'T paying you
    > money. The
    > funny thing is that your customers ARE paying you money for access
    > to Google
    > and Yahoo. Broadband gets a lot less compelling without content, so
    > don't
    > push it.

    Hah. Classic. But, but, Dan, that trick-or-treating wasn't all.
    But if they harness their own content, then what would you have.. a
    captive supplier to an mono/whateverpoly? Oh what fun that would be
    for Christmas, on a one horse open sleigh. 'Tis the season, guys. Ho
    Ho Ho.

    http://www.cabledatacomnews.com/nov05/nov05-6.html

    You've got to admit, though, the ability to completely fade out
    reality and invent your own is impressive, and those CEO's ought to
    be commended.

    And while we're doing this with RBOCs, we can bitch about MSOs just
    the same. One might find a surprising number of similarities.

    Best regards,
    Christian


  • Next message: Brandon Butterworth: "Re: SBC/AT&T + Verizon/MCI Peering Restrictions"





    Hosted Email Solutions

    Invaluement Anti-Spam DNSBLs



    Powered By FreeBSD   Powered By FreeBSD